<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can we stop misrepresenting our own movement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Narcissist Feminism &#124; Feminism @ the Hathor Legacy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-170807</link>
		<dc:creator>Narcissist Feminism &#124; Feminism @ the Hathor Legacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-170807</guid>
		<description>[...] You just can&#8217;t figure it out what the problem is when people point out that the stuff you&#8217;re proposing only benefits white heterosexual girls of means. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You just can&#8217;t figure it out what the problem is when people point out that the stuff you&#8217;re proposing only benefits white heterosexual girls of means. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The problem with feminism lite</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-159321</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The problem with feminism lite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-159321</guid>
		<description>[...] time this feminism lite gets marketed as the feminism (not always intentionally, but often through poor wording choices or just because the book becomes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time this feminism lite gets marketed as the feminism (not always intentionally, but often through poor wording choices or just because the book becomes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You can only say &#8216;Yes&#8217; if you can say &#8216;No&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-158019</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You can only say &#8216;Yes&#8217; if you can say &#8216;No&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-158019</guid>
		<description>[...] Valenti&#8217;s Call for Submissions for &#8216;Yes means Yes&#8217;.Firefly, BlackAmazon, Sylvia, Tekanji, Chris Clarke, Sudy, Magniloquence, and Theriomorph are just some of the people who have written [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valenti&#8217;s Call for Submissions for &#8216;Yes means Yes&#8217;.Firefly, BlackAmazon, Sylvia, Tekanji, Chris Clarke, Sudy, Magniloquence, and Theriomorph are just some of the people who have written [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is such bullshit. &#171; Problem Chylde: Learning in Transition</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-157513</link>
		<dc:creator>This is such bullshit. &#171; Problem Chylde: Learning in Transition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-157513</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m enjoying the disappearing act on so many people who have written so many thought-out and remarkable things on the subject of rape culture, feminism, women of color [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m enjoying the disappearing act on so many people who have written so many thought-out and remarkable things on the subject of rape culture, feminism, women of color [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministing, Men, Feminism, and Consent Controversy &#171; Editorializing the Editors</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-157494</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministing, Men, Feminism, and Consent Controversy &#171; Editorializing the Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-157494</guid>
		<description>[...] of no?&#8220;; Roy&#8217;s response to imfallingup on No Cookies for Me; tekanji&#8217;s &#8220;Can we stop misrepresenting our own movement?&#8220;; and plenty of conversations on a radfem forum about the call. After the forums, I read The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of no?&#8220;; Roy&#8217;s response to imfallingup on No Cookies for Me; tekanji&#8217;s &#8220;Can we stop misrepresenting our own movement?&#8220;; and plenty of conversations on a radfem forum about the call. After the forums, I read The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omitofo &#171; tomemos</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-156258</link>
		<dc:creator>Omitofo &#171; tomemos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-156258</guid>
		<description>[...] and intelligent.  Nevertheless, the same kind of duping is often present: at the Shrub Blog, I observed that some criticism of Yes Means Yes, in dismissing the link between women&#8217;s sexuality and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and intelligent.  Nevertheless, the same kind of duping is often present: at the Shrub Blog, I observed that some criticism of Yes Means Yes, in dismissing the link between women&#8217;s sexuality and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t you know that other kids are starving in Japan &#171; tomemos</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-155158</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t you know that other kids are starving in Japan &#171; tomemos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-155158</guid>
		<description>[...] where it spills over into unfounded incriminations of progressives generally.  At an excellent post by tekanji at Shrub Blog—a post that correctly critiques aspects of book&#8217;s promotional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where it spills over into unfounded incriminations of progressives generally.  At an excellent post by tekanji at Shrub Blog—a post that correctly critiques aspects of book&#8217;s promotional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna darko</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-155144</link>
		<dc:creator>donna darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-155144</guid>
		<description>The terminology of the proposal is very middle-class, white and trivializing but I agree with Riane Eisler&#039;s dominator to partnership, pain to pleasure paradigm shifts. Amanda Marcotte wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/21/on-pigs-basketball-frames-and-music/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a post&lt;/a&gt; about this. Basically, the conservative framing of sex is about conquest and liberal sex is like playing a duet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terminology of the proposal is very middle-class, white and trivializing but I agree with Riane Eisler&#8217;s dominator to partnership, pain to pleasure paradigm shifts. Amanda Marcotte wrote <a href="http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/06/21/on-pigs-basketball-frames-and-music/" rel="nofollow">a post</a> about this. Basically, the conservative framing of sex is about conquest and liberal sex is like playing a duet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spice Girls Feminism: why the third wave needs more than a band-aid</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-154736</link>
		<dc:creator>Spice Girls Feminism: why the third wave needs more than a band-aid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-154736</guid>
		<description>[...] BetaCandy   First I read Purtek and followed her links. I pored over the article and comments on Tekanji&#039;s blog. Then Purtek posted again, and led me to this glorious critique. I can&#039;t add much to the criticisms [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BetaCandy   First I read Purtek and followed her links. I pored over the article and comments on Tekanji&#8217;s blog. Then Purtek posted again, and led me to this glorious critique. I can&#8217;t add much to the criticisms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BetaCandy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677/comment-page-2#comment-153766</link>
		<dc:creator>BetaCandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-12-11_677#comment-153766</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;since my father taught me how to distinguish a man who thinks even slight coercion is okay from one who doesn’t,&lt;/i&gt;

I realized too late the irony might be lost here: I meant that he taught me that distinction by being a man who thought coercion of the female was a natural and acceptable part of sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>since my father taught me how to distinguish a man who thinks even slight coercion is okay from one who doesn’t,</i></p>
<p>I realized too late the irony might be lost here: I meant that he taught me that distinction by being a man who thought coercion of the female was a natural and acceptable part of sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
