Official Shrub.com Blog
Home Log in   About Us Discussion Rules
October 12, 2007
Here’s a noosey-noose to go with your Klan robe
by @ 10:37 pm

Disney Couture necklace
From the Pirates of the Caribbean “Dead Man’s Chest” collection - 14K gold plated 20″ Noose Necklace.

So, apparently racist iconography is the new couture. Come on, Disney, ARE YOU STUPID? I have no idea what wires got crossed in the company that they could see this as anything but a very, very bad idea. Especially on the wake of the Jenna Six incident.

I’ve had various problems with the company for a long time, but I think I’m with Sara in thinking that it’s finally time to just say “no” to Disney products. Until that company shapes up and, at the very least, stops actively being racist, I’m through with it.

Via Sara Speaking.

  [link]
Filed under Companies Behaving Badly; Disney; Racism

9 Responses to “Here’s a noosey-noose to go with your Klan robe”

  1. Pai says:

    What baffles me, is that when I think of ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’, the LAST image I’d get in my mind would be that of a noose. Of all things!

    How are nooses pirate-themed in the least?! Gawd, talk about being criminally clueless.


  2. tekanji says:

    I know! I mean, I was thinking, “I’ve only seen the first Pirates, so maybe I’m missing something,” but still.


  3. Beste says:

    The only thing I remember, is that Capt Jack was about to be hanged near the end of the first Pirates movie.


  4. Godless Heathen says:

    The entire Pirates of the Caribbean line of movies has been fairly problematic from the start. I pretty much wanted to smash in my television while watching the first movie. Elizabeth, the only female character to have more than a few seconds of screen time, gets threatened with rape twice! It’s not like I’m expecting frigging Disney to revolutionize the world, but just…damn.

    Noose jewelry, maybe Disney is trying to reach out to their consumers in Jena. I’m sure a lot of anxious white dudes would love to show off how “edgy” and anti-PC they are. Money talks I guess.


  5. Jade Reporting » 23 August says:

    [...] gaming… ORLY? Who’s the butt of the joke? For male gamers and readers, something embarrassing Here’s a noosey-noose to go with your Klan robe Japanese women are the biggest users of Wii and DS… ORLY? Debunking rumours: Chinese MMO’s [...]


  6. Phil says:

    I can see how a noose ornament could be an example of unintended racism, in much the same way that a Confederate-flag lapel pin (even if it were for a movie set during the Civil War) would be racist.

    I have trouble seeing how this is an example of being actively, racist, however, since it’s clearly meant to be an example of a pirate-noose, and not a Deep-South-lynching noose. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t a bad idea, but it just seems like a corporate gaffe. The goal with a lot of Disney products is to be a bit macabre, and I can see how they could cross a line without realizing it, or necessarily meaning to.

    Although the Pirates movies were sexist and kind of silly, I enjoyed the fact that an interracial relationship between was presented without attention being drawn to the races of the characters involved.

    The problem with boycotting a company like Disney is that there are so many other groups urging a boycott of Disney products that it’s unlikely that your reason for not buying Disney products will really be felt or heard by the people who are making the bad decisions that you disagree with.


  7. Pietoro says:

    It’s only ‘clearly’ meant to be a PotC charm IF YOU SEE IT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD. In the real world, anyone seeing someone wearing this would only see -a person wearing a noose-, and the cultural meanings it would imply in that context is impossible to just ‘brush off’.


  8. Phil says:

    Pietoro,
    Your point is well taken, unless someone was wearing other PotC gear to contextualize the charm. The most likely explanation for this seems to be that the people responsible for the decision to make a necklace like this just didn’t think about its implications. Does anyone think the most likely explanation is that the folks at Disney (or elsewhere) who approved the design were intentionally creating a racist symbol?


  9. tekanji says:

    Phil said:

    Does anyone think the most likely explanation is that the folks at Disney (or elsewhere) who approved the design were intentionally creating a racist symbol?

    No, but given the amount of money and resources Disney has at their disposal there is no excuse for not being aware of the racist implications.


Leave a Reply

Before posting a comment, you must read this blog's discussion rules. By posting here, you agree to abide by the rules listed. If you do not, your comment will most likely not be published. Trolling, flaming, and personal attacks will do nothing but get you banned.

  • Ableism 101

  • Blog Carnivals

  • Blog Vanity

  • Community Blogs

  • Contributors' Sites

  • Culture Blogs

  • Dear Privileged Groups:

  • Disability Activist Feminists

  • Feminism 101

  • Feminism 303

  • Feminist Gamers

  • Feminist Groups

  • Feminist Men

  • Feminist Parents

  • Feminists of Colour

  • Feminists on Sexuality

  • Gaming Geekery

  • Geeky Feminists

  • Geeky Resources

  • Health Products

  • LJ Communities

  • More Feminists

  • Online News & Journals

  • Other Groups

  • Personal is Political Blogs

  • Political Feminists

  • Pop-culture Blogs

  • Privilege 101

  • Privilege Checklists

  • Queer Activist Blogs

  • Queer Feminists

  • Race Relations 101

  • Racial Activist Blogs

  • Reproductive Rights

  • Resources

  • Science and Technology Blogs

  • Services

  • Tag-team Feminism

  • Technology Groups

  • Transgender Resources

  • Unclassified Blogs

  • Useful Plugins

  • WordPress

  • All original content Official Shrub.com Blog is copyrighted by Shrub.com; any other material used with permission or according to fair use remains the sole property of the owner. Please contact the the site administrator for further details regarding acceptable use policy.

    Contents and Graphics Copyrighted © Andrea Rubenstein
    Efficient Recently Commented Posts plugin © Michael Moore.
    Official Shrub.com Blog is proudly powered by WordPress.

    Shrub.com Logo © 2004, Andrea Rubenstein
    About
    Shrub.com's official blog is a space for our members to share their opinions on politics, culture, feminism, video games, and whatever else interests them.
    Recent Comments
    Categories
  • All
  • Anti-oppression activism (1)
  • Carnivals, Blog Against -ism Days, etc. (49)
  • Censorship (2)
  • Childfree Issues (9)
  • Companies Behaving Badly (26)
  • Discrimination (10)
  • Features (1)
  • Feminism (234)
  • Gender essentialism (70)
  • Just plain cool (1)
  • Link Blogging (22)
  • Multiculturalism (26)
  • Personal (62)
  • Politics (73)
  • Popular Culture (196)
  • Privilege (71)
  • Queer Issues (27)
  • Religion (12)
  • Science (27)
  • Series (38)
  • Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics (64)
  • Shrub.com Related (64)
  • Technology (18)
  • Teh Funnay (16)
  • The Evil -ism's (116)
  • Blog Search
    Archives
    TTLB Ecosystem
    RSS Feeds
    Valid XHTML
    Other
    Valid XHTML
    XFN
    Boycott Staforce

    StatCounter