<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I the only one bothered by this?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-121085</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-121085</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;L. Keller:&lt;/b&gt; The same could be argued about the "make me a sammich" jokes, but the use of them makes it no less harmful. Also, please refrain from using ablist slurs like "lame" on this blog. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L. Keller:</b> The same could be argued about the &#8220;make me a sammich&#8221; jokes, but the use of them makes it no less harmful. Also, please refrain from using ablist slurs like &#8220;lame&#8221; on this blog. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Keller</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-120636</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-120636</guid>
		<description>No, you aren't the only one bothered by this. 
One note: I think "boob and dick-joke posts" means "boob posts and dick-joke posts because we're acknowledging or joking about the way we perpetuate this stuff", not "boob-joke and dick-joke posts because we're making a lame attempt to say we're equal-opportunity mockers".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you aren&#8217;t the only one bothered by this.<br />
One note: I think &#8220;boob and dick-joke posts&#8221; means &#8220;boob posts and dick-joke posts because we&#8217;re acknowledging or joking about the way we perpetuate this stuff&#8221;, not &#8220;boob-joke and dick-joke posts because we&#8217;re making a lame attempt to say we&#8217;re equal-opportunity mockers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickle</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79871</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79871</guid>
		<description>re: Thing 3

There seems to be a distinct lack of understanding going around regarding what makes something ironically funny - rather than just making fun of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Thing 3</p>
<p>There seems to be a distinct lack of understanding going around regarding what makes something ironically funny - rather than just making fun of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79830</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79830</guid>
		<description>They could have at least shown a picture of a woman using a computer. Her hands are not even on the keyboard - and it makes it appear that she bought it not to use, but because it is "cute and pink". A realistic photo should have had her hunched over her laptop, hands on the keys, and certainly a less vapid stare.

I myself have had to struggle with being a girl in "geekdom" recently, and it is hard to get respect. And while being underestimated has sometimes given me the upper hand, it does not feel that great when you hope to command respect. And while it is hard work to get the "props" we all deserve, I think more and more men are coming to see that we are equal players online and otherwise.

Once again, great post. This blog never fails to give me something to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could have at least shown a picture of a woman using a computer. Her hands are not even on the keyboard - and it makes it appear that she bought it not to use, but because it is &#8220;cute and pink&#8221;. A realistic photo should have had her hunched over her laptop, hands on the keys, and certainly a less vapid stare.</p>
<p>I myself have had to struggle with being a girl in &#8220;geekdom&#8221; recently, and it is hard to get respect. And while being underestimated has sometimes given me the upper hand, it does not feel that great when you hope to command respect. And while it is hard work to get the &#8220;props&#8221; we all deserve, I think more and more men are coming to see that we are equal players online and otherwise.</p>
<p>Once again, great post. This blog never fails to give me something to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79482</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79482</guid>
		<description>I don't know why he'd want to undermine an article he'd written by engaging in the very same displays he's criticising in another article. You'd think he'd have a little more interest in self-preservation yeah? 

The picture makes me cringe. I don't think I'd be able to take seriously whatever article it's accompanying unless the caption makes it clear that the author is using it to illustrate a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why he&#8217;d want to undermine an article he&#8217;d written by engaging in the very same displays he&#8217;s criticising in another article. You&#8217;d think he&#8217;d have a little more interest in self-preservation yeah? </p>
<p>The picture makes me cringe. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be able to take seriously whatever article it&#8217;s accompanying unless the caption makes it clear that the author is using it to illustrate a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dido Revisited &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ludditism: An Equal-Oportunity Pastime</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79303</link>
		<dc:creator>Dido Revisited &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ludditism: An Equal-Oportunity Pastime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79303</guid>
		<description>[...] (6/12/07) I came across an excellent blog post at Shrub.com tangentially related to this article. Go read it, and the rest of the Shrub [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (6/12/07) I came across an excellent blog post at Shrub.com tangentially related to this article. Go read it, and the rest of the Shrub [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100littledolls</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79264</link>
		<dc:creator>100littledolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comment-79264</guid>
		<description>It's all two steps forward, one step back.  :(

I know someone has pointed this out before, but women in underwear posing with tech is the same as women posing with cars in underwear.  Which really speaks to the whole tech gadgets as male hobby thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all two steps forward, one step back.  <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I know someone has pointed this out before, but women in underwear posing with tech is the same as women posing with cars in underwear.  Which really speaks to the whole tech gadgets as male hobby thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
