Comments on: Introduction [Loving Our Bodies, Part 1] http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552 Because we care about stuff Sun, 09 May 2010 19:08:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Darth Sidhe http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42023 Darth Sidhe Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:35:57 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42023 Nope. Still looking. I think someone on one of the LJ communities <i>linked</i> to the article, but it was definitely off-site. Nope. Still looking. I think someone on one of the LJ communities linked to the article, but it was definitely off-site.

]]> By: tekanji http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42019 tekanji Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:47:03 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42019 Ah, well, I dunno. Maybe it was on LJ and that's why you can't find it? Ah, well, I dunno. Maybe it was on LJ and that’s why you can’t find it?

]]> By: Darth Sidhe http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42015 Darth Sidhe Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:40:47 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42015 No, I believe the writer of the article I'm referencing is named David something, and certainly didn't have this particular argument attached to it. The article focused on the Duke trial. No, I believe the writer of the article I’m referencing is named David something, and certainly didn’t have this particular argument attached to it. The article focused on the Duke trial.

]]> By: tekanji http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42006 tekanji Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:26:42 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42006 Wait, could it be this is what you were thinking of? <blockquote>The male overexposure to women has even led to the death of the heterosexual man as we know him. If the definition of a heterosexual man is a male who is attracted to women, then most men today are barely heterosexual. Think about it. Nearly all the men I know are only attracted to about one in 10 women, that is, the 10 percent of women they consider "hot." The other 90 percent leave them cold. Doesn't that mean that they are 90 percent <i>a</i>sexual? And I'm not trying to be funny. If a man is not attracted to a woman, then he is not heterosexual. Period. And if he only attracted to a small fraction of the women he meets, then he is <i>fractionally</i> heterosexual. <div align="right"><b>[From <a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50051" rel="nofollow">Asexual men and the creeps who live on campus</a> by Shmuley Boteach]</b></div></blockquote> The article mentions the Duke rape trial in the beginning, although I can't say that I agree with the argument Boteach is making. Wait, could it be this is what you were thinking of?

The male overexposure to women has even led to the death of the heterosexual man as we know him. If the definition of a heterosexual man is a male who is attracted to women, then most men today are barely heterosexual. Think about it. Nearly all the men I know are only attracted to about one in 10 women, that is, the 10 percent of women they consider “hot.” The other 90 percent leave them cold. Doesn't that mean that they are 90 percent asexual? And I'm not trying to be funny. If a man is not attracted to a woman, then he is not heterosexual. Period. And if he only attracted to a small fraction of the women he meets, then he is fractionally heterosexual.

The article mentions the Duke rape trial in the beginning, although I can’t say that I agree with the argument Boteach is making.

]]> By: tekanji http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42004 tekanji Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:20:33 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42004 Sorry, DS, my google skills are failing me, too. I tried technorati, just in case, but all I came up with was people complaining about how "the only crime the boys were guilty of was being rich, white, heterosexual men." Ick. Sorry, DS, my google skills are failing me, too. I tried technorati, just in case, but all I came up with was people complaining about how “the only crime the boys were guilty of was being rich, white, heterosexual men.” Ick.

]]> By: Darth Sidhe http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552/comment-page-1#comment-42003 Darth Sidhe Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:09:30 +0000 http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-03-08_552#comment-42003 With reference to that myspace thread, someone comments, "Interesting how many guys who use words that describe female genitalia as insults would probably really love to have some..." I remember reading an article on the Duke rape trial that said something like, "If heterosexuality in men means men loving women, then the males involved in this trial are some of the least heterosexual out there." Any idea where that article is? My Google-fu is weak today. With reference to that myspace thread, someone comments, “Interesting how many guys who use words that describe female genitalia as insults would probably really love to have some…” I remember reading an article on the Duke rape trial that said something like, “If heterosexuality in men means men loving women, then the males involved in this trial are some of the least heterosexual out there.” Any idea where that article is? My Google-fu is weak today.

]]>