<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formatting Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Didnâ€™t the text used to switch to sans-serif and smaller, as opposed to unblockquoted text, which was serif and larger?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, it did. And it had a darker background and blue text.

I just found that, for larger blocks of quoted text, the font was &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; small, and the sans-serif hurt my eyes. Sans-serif usually is not a good choice for reading long blocks of text, and indeed is not recommended by any style guides because it's harder to read. (It's great for headings and other small bits of text, though).

I wouldn't mind switching to another kind of serif-font, but it's hard to find good fonts that are default on both PC and Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Didnâ€™t the text used to switch to sans-serif and smaller, as opposed to unblockquoted text, which was serif and larger?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, it did. And it had a darker background and blue text.</p>
<p>I just found that, for larger blocks of quoted text, the font was <i>too</i> small, and the sans-serif hurt my eyes. Sans-serif usually is not a good choice for reading long blocks of text, and indeed is not recommended by any style guides because it&#8217;s harder to read. (It&#8217;s great for headings and other small bits of text, though).</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind switching to another kind of serif-font, but it&#8217;s hard to find good fonts that are default on both PC and Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13585</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13585</guid>
		<description>Didn't the text used to switch to sans-serif and smaller, as opposed to unblockquoted text, which was serif and larger?

I thought that helped a LOT with readability and was thinking about adopting it myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the text used to switch to sans-serif and smaller, as opposed to unblockquoted text, which was serif and larger?</p>
<p>I thought that helped a LOT with readability and was thinking about adopting it myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13417</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13417</guid>
		<description>Hmm, it's supposed to just be a lighter shade of green, but I do agree that the colour is still off. I'll play with it tomorrow when I have time. Thanks for the input!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, it&#8217;s supposed to just be a lighter shade of green, but I do agree that the colour is still off. I&#8217;ll play with it tomorrow when I have time. Thanks for the input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beste</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13409</link>
		<dc:creator>beste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13409</guid>
		<description>I actually find it less readable.. I think the yellow causes a little bit of a colour clash and it strains my eyes. I was quite happy with the old blockquotes/

But then again I am just an MRA dissenter so just ignore me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually find it less readable.. I think the yellow causes a little bit of a colour clash and it strains my eyes. I was quite happy with the old blockquotes/</p>
<p>But then again I am just an MRA dissenter so just ignore me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13408</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 08:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-02_473#comment-13408</guid>
		<description>More readable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More readable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
