<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Female Villains Can&#8217;t Win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Zeev:&lt;/b&gt; Of course this is an improvement, not just from NWN 1, but from a lot of video games out there. I acknowledge this in my article, and indeed most of what I say is praise of the character designs for laying the foundation for a broader range of female villian archetypes. 

My point, however, is that &lt;i&gt;even with&lt;/i&gt; those improvements, they can't escape being sexualized -- not just in the screenshots, but as importantly by the author of the Joystiq article. The parts that I praise, he criticizes because it doesn't fit the "hot babe" villain archetype that is the most common for women in video games (and, indeed, most of the mainstream fantasy genre). Sexy women are not a problem, but when there's a culture of entitlement that &lt;i&gt;expects&lt;/i&gt; sexy women and therefore &lt;i&gt;limits&lt;/i&gt; the range of expression for female characters then that &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a problem.

Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Zeev:</b> Of course this is an improvement, not just from NWN 1, but from a lot of video games out there. I acknowledge this in my article, and indeed most of what I say is praise of the character designs for laying the foundation for a broader range of female villian archetypes. </p>
<p>My point, however, is that <i>even with</i> those improvements, they can&#8217;t escape being sexualized &#8212; not just in the screenshots, but as importantly by the author of the Joystiq article. The parts that I praise, he criticizes because it doesn&#8217;t fit the &#8220;hot babe&#8221; villain archetype that is the most common for women in video games (and, indeed, most of the mainstream fantasy genre). Sexy women are not a problem, but when there&#8217;s a culture of entitlement that <i>expects</i> sexy women and therefore <i>limits</i> the range of expression for female characters then that <i>is</i> a problem.</p>
<p>Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeev</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-12206</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-12206</guid>
		<description>I don't think those images are very sexual at all. The last one shows a bit of cleavage but I don't think that's necessarily a sexual thing. In fact I think it's a massive improvement from NWN 1 and far better than many other games. Remember NWN? Load up the main screen and have a look at the random woman wearing a chainmail bikini. It has nipple points in it. You know, so that the 13 year old fanboys don't have to think too much about what her  boobs look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think those images are very sexual at all. The last one shows a bit of cleavage but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s necessarily a sexual thing. In fact I think it&#8217;s a massive improvement from NWN 1 and far better than many other games. Remember NWN? Load up the main screen and have a look at the random woman wearing a chainmail bikini. It has nipple points in it. You know, so that the 13 year old fanboys don&#8217;t have to think too much about what her  boobs look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinz</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>vinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>There's a few, GL, but since this is about role-playing games I don't think they count, since they're not coded by the same clueless goobers.

Two examples here:
Soul Calibur's Yunsung
http://www.hongyunsung.com/images/version5index2_19.jpg
and
Dynasty Warrior's Zhang He 
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~tkiyono/Web%20Page/ZhangHe.jpg
(who dresses more sensibly in the following games.)
I don't know of any non-Square RPGs with barely-clothed males though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a few, GL, but since this is about role-playing games I don&#8217;t think they count, since they&#8217;re not coded by the same clueless goobers.</p>
<p>Two examples here:<br />
Soul Calibur&#8217;s Yunsung<br />
<a href="http://www.hongyunsung.com/images/version5index2_19.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.hongyunsung.com/images/version5index2_19.jpg</a><br />
and<br />
Dynasty Warrior&#8217;s Zhang He<br />
<a href="http://www2.hawaii.edu/~tkiyono/Web%20Page/ZhangHe.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www2.hawaii.edu/~tkiyono/Web%20Page/ZhangHe.jpg</a><br />
(who dresses more sensibly in the following games.)<br />
I don&#8217;t know of any non-Square RPGs with barely-clothed males though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sexualizing Powerful Poses</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sexualizing Powerful Poses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>[...] In my post Female Villains Canâ€™t Win, one of the things I mentioned was that even in their powerful poses, women were sexualized. Peatbogfaery asked if I had any other examples than what I provided. Initially I was just going to reply on the thread, but it&#8217;s taken on a life of its own (when does it not?), so here it is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my post Female Villains Canâ€™t Win, one of the things I mentioned was that even in their powerful poses, women were sexualized. Peatbogfaery asked if I had any other examples than what I provided. Initially I was just going to reply on the thread, but it&#8217;s taken on a life of its own (when does it not?), so here it is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3052</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3052</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;peatbogfaery:&lt;/b&gt; Good question! I made it its own post &lt;a href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-11_423" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>peatbogfaery:</b> Good question! I made it its own post <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-11_423" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peatbogfaery</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>peatbogfaery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>Great post - can you think of any 'power' posture for females that couldn't be described as sexual?  I tried, but couldn't come up with anything :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post - can you think of any &#8216;power&#8217; posture for females that couldn&#8217;t be described as sexual?  I tried, but couldn&#8217;t come up with anything <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heresy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>heresy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>I have heard of a character you can unlock in Dead or Alive 4, and she is a female. Unlike the other women in the game, she actually has body armor to protect herself in combat. The unlockable character is a Spartan 458 modeled after Master Chief of Halo 2. Of course, it still does not take away from the overall message of gender roles in both the hero and villian roles of video games. There should be more feminist video games as well as feminist comic books. That would be awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard of a character you can unlock in Dead or Alive 4, and she is a female. Unlike the other women in the game, she actually has body armor to protect herself in combat. The unlockable character is a Spartan 458 modeled after Master Chief of Halo 2. Of course, it still does not take away from the overall message of gender roles in both the hero and villian roles of video games. There should be more feminist video games as well as feminist comic books. That would be awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little cabbage</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>little cabbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>This is a really good post.

For a notable exception, though, look at Princess Theradras of World of Warcraft. I suppose in her case, though, her radical ugliness is sort of the mirror image of other female villains' beauty: instead of being beautiful and therefore wicked, she's ugly and therefore wicked. 

Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good post.</p>
<p>For a notable exception, though, look at Princess Theradras of World of Warcraft. I suppose in her case, though, her radical ugliness is sort of the mirror image of other female villains&#8217; beauty: instead of being beautiful and therefore wicked, she&#8217;s ugly and therefore wicked. </p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhiannon</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2944</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhiannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2944</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Female villians are definately screwed in the armor area.  Female Heros are typically pretty screwed there too... who in the gaming world really thinks that armor does a bit of good when it leaves you stomach exposed like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Female villians are definately screwed in the armor area.  Female Heros are typically pretty screwed there too&#8230; who in the gaming world really thinks that armor does a bit of good when it leaves you stomach exposed like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikae</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>tikae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-04_410#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>I had hoped that the blue chick was an undead female warrior who was killed because she went into battle in such a skimpy outfit, but no. 

I don't think that Torio is mannish on purpose. I think it's just bad art. Behold Mira, from Obsidian's other game:
http://www.gamebanshee.com/starwarskotorii/npcs/images/mira.jpg
http://kauler.com/games/kotor/K2%20-%20023%20-%20Mira%20jedi.jpg

Although Mira does have the odd and likely unique quality where her exposed breasts are no larger than a B-cup and actually look natural, her face still looks "off" and not just because it's somewhat masculine. All that makes me think is that the artists spent more time on the chests of the characters than they did on their faces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had hoped that the blue chick was an undead female warrior who was killed because she went into battle in such a skimpy outfit, but no. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that Torio is mannish on purpose. I think it&#8217;s just bad art. Behold Mira, from Obsidian&#8217;s other game:<br />
<a href="http://www.gamebanshee.com/starwarskotorii/npcs/images/mira.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamebanshee.com/starwarskotorii/npcs/images/mira.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://kauler.com/games/kotor/K2%20-%20023%20-%20Mira%20jedi.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://kauler.com/games/kotor/K2%20-%20023%20-%20Mira%20jedi.jpg</a></p>
<p>Although Mira does have the odd and likely unique quality where her exposed breasts are no larger than a B-cup and actually look natural, her face still looks &#8220;off&#8221; and not just because it&#8217;s somewhat masculine. All that makes me think is that the artists spent more time on the chests of the characters than they did on their faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
