For one thing, there are incompatible definitions of “sex-positive” out there.

For another thing, there are incompatible definitions of “radical feminism.” (Thus the genesis of my humorous avatar showing the square root sign over the alchemical symbol for woman: by some people’s definitions I am one, by others I am not at all. A rose by any other name still has thorns…)

For a third, many people self-identify as both.

A more useful breakdown might be by major fields of interest, or countries/regions of origin: I’m always interested in reading what’s going on in other countries and compare/contrast to my own, and sometimes I’ll be reading someone for a while and then realize that they’re in England or Canada or Taiwan and that changes everything a little and opens up new fields for discussion - what are the rules & customs where YOU are? How is the experience of being an ethnic minority different? Of being a fan? as well as of being a feminist?

Feminists-with-children might be another useful category - but as always, all categories overlap. But since the rightwing insists that happily-partnered and parenting feminist women don’t exist, (just as they insist that all male feminists are merely pretending so as to get nookie) this would be a useful tool for instruction as well as a way of increasing solidarity.

Just a few thoughts…

air