<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dividing to include, including to divide?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: limasbravo</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>limasbravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Interesting how Connie Rosenquist mentions &lt;b&gt;&quot;which spare us details of their sexual practices&quot;&lt;/b&gt;.

That&#039;s part of the issue.  People can&#039;t see past the sex.  Back when people were against different race relationships people couldn&#039;t see past the sex as well.  A white woman would be with a black man and immediately people would start saying that &quot;well she really be into sex&quot;.  They couldn&#039;t get past the sex part and see that the two people loved each other and wanted to be with each other.  I read a major research paper about that once that compared the two subjects.  Different race relationships and same-sex relationships are very similar in what people are using as excuses against them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how Connie Rosenquist mentions <b>&#8220;which spare us details of their sexual practices&#8221;</b>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s part of the issue.  People can&#8217;t see past the sex.  Back when people were against different race relationships people couldn&#8217;t see past the sex as well.  A white woman would be with a black man and immediately people would start saying that &#8220;well she really be into sex&#8221;.  They couldn&#8217;t get past the sex part and see that the two people loved each other and wanted to be with each other.  I read a major research paper about that once that compared the two subjects.  Different race relationships and same-sex relationships are very similar in what people are using as excuses against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100littledolls</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>100littledolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>Just in regards to the title of the month, even living in Chicago I&#039;ve been shocked by how many times I&#039;ll use &quot;GLBT,&quot; only to be asked what the letters stand for.

Anyways, I want to print this post out and show it to my grandparents back home--it gets to everything that I&#039;ve wanted to say them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in regards to the title of the month, even living in Chicago I&#8217;ve been shocked by how many times I&#8217;ll use &#8220;GLBT,&#8221; only to be asked what the letters stand for.</p>
<p>Anyways, I want to print this post out and show it to my grandparents back home&#8211;it gets to everything that I&#8217;ve wanted to say them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-06-13_295#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>But don&#039;t you get it?  You have to be tolerant!  Of their intolerance!  Liberals are supposed to be tolerant!  Tolerance!  HYPOCRITE!

I think that about sums up the argument in a nutshell, don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But don&#8217;t you get it?  You have to be tolerant!  Of their intolerance!  Liberals are supposed to be tolerant!  Tolerance!  HYPOCRITE!</p>
<p>I think that about sums up the argument in a nutshell, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
