Wonder Woman brings up problems with E3's dress code

I blogged about my mixed feelings regarding E3’s crackdown on booth babes a while ago, but it seems the ambiguous wording has caused some problems. Kasey Poteet, a VJ for MusicPlusTV, decided to put the policy to the test by dressing up as Wonder Woman.

I. Against the rules? By the rules? What ARE the rules, anyway?

If you’re wondering what Wonder Woman costume would merit being kicked out but don’t want to watch the film, you can see a screenshot of Kasey’s outfit here:

Inappropriate Attire
Inappropriate?

At first glance I could have told you that E3 would deem her attire inappropriate, seeing as she has on what amounts to a sparkly bathing suit. But, given the ambiguity of the rules I personally have seen, I believe her claim that she read through all the handbook carefully before deciding on her outfit.

What she says next, however, really sticks with me [emphasis mine]:

I would also like to point out that, uh, I am representing a game that they are showing here, wearing more clothes than the character from the game. And yet I’m still inappropriate to minors, which aren’t even allowed to be in the show. From what I understand it says 18 and over.

I’m going to address the latter point first, as I think it illustrates the weakness of using minors as a shield. If E3 allowed people under the age of 18 in, then it might carry more weight. I mean, while I’m not sure I personally agree, I can see the logic behind trying to stay away from “adult” themes and materials during an event that is attended by a lot of minors.

Putting off the discussion on whether or not a Wonder Woman costume is “adult” themed or not for the moment, I think that saying that claiming the dress code violation is offensive to children erases the entire reason behind the offense. The point is not — or at least I don’t think it should be — that sexuality, or sexiness is wrong or whatever, but rather that the abuse of booth babes was taking the focus away from the game by using women as sexual objects.

Which leads me to my next point…

II. Good for the game, not for the cosplayer?

Justice League: Heroes for PS2Another issue that has been overlooked by E3’s ban on booth babes, and apparently any woman atendee whom they deem inappropriate, is that it severely limits women’s ability to cosplay as female characters. Especially female characters in upcoming games.

Kasey’s costume was a pretty typical Wonder Woman costume. The one my sister wore for Halloween a few years ago wasn’t much different, in fact. I’m not sure if the featured game was Justice League: Heroes or not, but I’ve included a screencap of Wonder Woman from that on the left. No matter what incarnation — including the one with the skirt — Wonder Woman has always worn a glorified bathing suit.Inappropriate?

Other popular characters like Lara Croft, Rayne, even Rikku from Final Fantasy X-2 would be banned from potential cosplay lists given E3’s rules, too. While there are undoubtedly male characters, such as Conan or perhaps the Hulk, that are similarly limited, the laundry list of usual suspects isn’t nearly as long. In fact, I was kind of grasping for the two I mentioned.

I wish Kasey had given more airtime to her comment about how her costume wasn’t any worse, and perhaps showed less skin, than that of Wonder Woman in the game. This is an issue that has gotten swept under the rug by the language E3 has chosen to employ in its rules. If these kinds of costumes are inappropriate for the people attending the convention, then why are they acceptable in their showcased games? Why does E3 allow games that create these kinds of characters that are inappropriate to cosplay in their non-adult games?

III. Wonder Woman: Crusader for justice or perpetuator of raunch culture?

I don’t know how I feel about Kasey’s stance on all this. While trying to find more clips of her show, I checked out her profile on MusicPlusTV and MySpace. She’s out there being a VJ, which I think is cool. She took a stance and stuck to it; also cool.

What bugs me, though, is that she pushes herself as sexy first and a geek second. To clarify:

    Tits are not indecent
  1. She seems to cosplay as “sexy” characters on her show. From the two clips I could find, she cosplays in outfits that show off her figure. Okay, given what I said in Section II of this post, that in itself is not so surprising. Nor something I can get overly grumpy about, although I’d feel better if I knew that her male co-host also did the cosplay thing.
  2. The vast majorities of pictures of her that I saw were of her naked, partially naked, and/or in erotic poses. She’s a model, so she’s obviously proud of her body and it makes sense that she’d want to show it off. She’s also into fighting sexual censorship, which I admire, but I personally don’t think that her approach gainfully combats a sex negative society. Especially given the way that geek culture already objectifies fictional women as well as real geeks who happen to be women.
  3. She projects a ditzy persona.This last point probably pisses me off the most. Even her having a bubbly personality doesn’t explain her saying things like “[sometimes I’m] WAAAAAAY to thinky,” and just in general downplaying the intelligent woman that I’m convinced that she is.

Bringing that over to her activism at E3, I must admit that I was at first annoyed. I thought to myself, “Did she honestly think they were going to let her in???” But, having watched the clip and sat and thought about the issue, I don’t really think she did. I think her entire point was to bring light to this issue.

I don’t know if there was more discussion on this outside of the clip, or if it was brought up in a later episode. Because of that, I don’t know exactly what angle she was approaching it from. Given her brand of activism, I think part of it might be from the, “Look, they’re barring women who want to do this from doing it!” And I both agree and disagree with that sentiment — something to be discussed in further detail at a later date, although I will say that I find the way in which E3 has chosen to approach this issue as troublesome (ya think?).

I also think that she wanted to bring to light the hypocrisy of E3’s attitude towards real women versus their silence of the women they allow to be showcased in the games. At least, that’s what her one line about Wonder Woman’s in-game costume conveyed to me. Seeing as, you know, I ended up writing a lengthy post on the matter.

Overall, I’d have to say that despite not agreeing with the way in which Kasey conducts her politics, I am glad that she took a stand. I’m glad that her stand was passed around the internet and that I found it.

IV. Conclusion

Bringing things back to the original issue, about E3 and its ambiguous line about “appropriate” oufits… Wonder Woman is not rated M for mature. She’s not sexually explicit. What she, and Lara, and Rayne, and even friggin Rikku, are is objectified. For good, ill, or neutral, that’s the lot of most video game women. Up until this year, real women were dressing up in the same manner that the video game creators dressed up these characters. Because of this they, too, were objectified.

And E3’s enforcement of the dress code has done nothing to address this root cause. In fact, I’d go farther to say that it has covered it up like some dirty little secret. When the announcement to ban booth babes was first made, I was skeptical. And, I think this incident has caused me to realize why: the lack of booth babes at E3 has done nothing to change the boy’s club of video games, nothing to fight or even address the ever-present objectification of women, and in the end amounts to nothing but them becoming hypocritical moral police of what women can and can’t wear.

Via When Fangirls Attack.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
This entry was posted in Comics, cartoons, manga, and anime, Gender issues, Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics, Video Games. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Wonder Woman brings up problems with E3's dress code

  1. Luke says:

    Wow, i’m kinda out of the loop when it comes to new new game stuff so I had no idea they banned booth women models and whatnot but I knew it was a growing maximesq trend. Ya, it is definitely a hypocritical move on their part to say one is bad but not the other. I think vidgames have had the same cultural thing in terms of babe-models much like car culture and import car culture in particular. somehow cars synonymous with babes i guess? Honda or Toyota, i forget which one..used mixed race asian/white models to show off their hybrid cars a few years ago. in both mediums, seemed like the women got more attention than the games or cars themselves. the women take up just as much if not more textual space than the info on cars in import tuner covers…and the last EGM I saw had a full two page collage exclusively on game models and “the coolest exhibitionists!”

  2. Lake Desire says:

    Great post! You’ve inspired my own response on NG+.

  3. Another Jeff says:

    I’m still trying to figure out what I think about this:

    * As you pointed out, I think banning (accurate) cosplayers is missing the forest for the trees. Especially if they’re using a “For the Children” argument; last I checked, Justice League: Heroes was not going to be rated M.

    * I’m not all that familiar with the specifics of E3, but I thought it was supposed to be more of a trade show than a con. (E3 is the one you need “connections” to get into, right?) Cosplay at a trade show seems odd to me. This may just be the bitterness at not being invited to the party, but aren’t they supposed to be there to (a) advertise a product or (b) report on the products? If they’re just there to cosplay, play the demos, etc., then why limit the attendance?

  4. tekanji says:

    I’m not all that familiar with the specifics of E3, but I thought it was supposed to be more of a trade show than a con.

    Well, that’s the theory, anyway.

    (E3 is the one you need “connections” to get into, right?)

    Very tenuous, but yes. For instance, working at EB as a salesperson has been enough in the past. I don’t know if they have changed this policy or not.

    This may just be the bitterness at not being invited to the party, but aren’t they supposed to be there to (a) advertise a product or (b) report on the products? If they’re just there to cosplay, play the demos, etc., then why limit the attendance?

    I agree with you, as do many people. On the one hand, I think that allowing cosplay encourages a fun environment — and games should be fun! — but, on the other hand… hello, professionalism? The other main driving reason behind this ban???

    I know a lot of hardcore techies who believe that E3 is a joke for these reasons. I myself don’t know what to think. On the one hand, they have some kick ass conferences (never been there first hand, the films of them were just… wow…), on the other hand the actual show room stinks of rampant sexism, stupidity, and unprofessionalism. And not just from the atendees, either (developers, I’m looking at you).

  5. Rodney says:

    Guess this is why she is doing porn now.

  6. G33kRawkDon says:

    Im a little late…I keep finding these discussions about our adventure at E3 and occasionally feel teh need to comment.
    Kasey and I co-hosted G33KRAWK and she is, indeed, a dyed in the wool G33K. YOu dont see a lot of what happened during the encounter (or before and after). I was the word man for G33kRawk…or as Kasey liked to say, the ‘Thinky Guy’. I coached Kasey before hand that IF E3 gave us a problem that she should bring up certain points. I also instructed my cameraman, Roz, to shoot from the hip. The E3 staff assumed we werent filming because teh camera was visible but at Roz’s side. Was it a publicity stunt? Yes and no. It garnered attention for our show (on an international level) but it also drew attention to the stupidity, futility and lack of common sense on teh part of E3 event staff. BTW, these folks were employees of the Convention Center NOT E3. We had no problem getting in to E3 it was only when the dowdy sour faced old woman (seen in the video) saw Kasey that there was an issue. Several members of teh staff had actually approached to have pics taken with Kasey prior to this woman intervening. The whole thing was pathetic and showed in glorious technicolor how ill equipped the LA COnvention Center was to host E3. Clueless and out of touch. I felt like I was at an Amish Porn Shoot.
    M+TV is long gone but G33KRAWK is still smoldering. Kasey and I are contacted almost daily by folks in the entertainment industry and by fans wondering when we will be returning….
    Stay Tuned…
    Don Gaffney
    Host Of G33KRAWK
    Los Angeles, CA

Comments are closed.