<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Request for Reader Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Well, I just got here, but I think it is a good list. I've always preferred some kind of guide instead of just a massive list of links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I just got here, but I think it is a good list. I&#8217;ve always preferred some kind of guide instead of just a massive list of links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the suggestion :D I took it with slight modification</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestion <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> I took it with slight modification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Team Feminism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team Feminism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Since you're full of good ideas, do you have any suggestions for what to call the category? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re full of good ideas, do you have any suggestions for what to call the category? <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Would make sense, since even though he's the owner, its not solely his blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would make sense, since even though he&#8217;s the owner, its not solely his blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Do you think that would take precedence over the other classifications? For instance, would Amp's blog belong in the group category because multiple (non-men) blog on it, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Do you think that would take precedence over the other classifications? For instance, would Amp&#8217;s blog belong in the group category because multiple (non-men) blog on it, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-695</guid>
		<description>You could split up the group blogs from the single ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could split up the group blogs from the single ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that's my "Oh, crap, I can't think of any good categories!" category. I'm completely open to suggestions on how to whittle it down better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s my &#8220;Oh, crap, I can&#8217;t think of any good categories!&#8221; category. I&#8217;m completely open to suggestions on how to whittle it down better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-18_174#comment-690</guid>
		<description>No, it's useful -- though the "more feminists" is a big and diverse category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s useful &#8212; though the &#8220;more feminists&#8221; is a big and diverse category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
