<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex-positive does not mean misogyny-friendly!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-12815</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-12815</guid>
		<description>So many Andreas in this post!  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many Andreas in this post!  <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist In-Fighting &#171; One Woman Army</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-6613</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist In-Fighting &#171; One Woman Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-6613</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Stop it. Stop invalidating me because of my reproductive choices. Stop telling me what is and is not worthy of discussion. Stop calling me names because I have a different sexual expression than you. Stop discriminating against our sisters just because they donâ€™t have the same naughty bits as you. Stop telling women that they should not be allowed to choose their lifeâ€™s path. And, for the love of little green apples, stop trying to make the only valid path in life the one you want to take. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Stop it. Stop invalidating me because of my reproductive choices. Stop telling me what is and is not worthy of discussion. Stop calling me names because I have a different sexual expression than you. Stop discriminating against our sisters just because they donâ€™t have the same naughty bits as you. Stop telling women that they should not be allowed to choose their lifeâ€™s path. And, for the love of little green apples, stop trying to make the only valid path in life the one you want to take. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myca</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>Myca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>Tekanji, I cannot possibly begin to thank you enough for writing this. This is the most clearly written explaination of what &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; mean when I say 'sex-positive' I've ever seen.

Every single time I see someone write "Pshaw! Sex positive just means 'pro-porn'," I'll direct them here.

With your permission, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tekanji, I cannot possibly begin to thank you enough for writing this. This is the most clearly written explaination of what <i>I</i> mean when I say &#8217;sex-positive&#8217; I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p>Every single time I see someone write &#8220;Pshaw! Sex positive just means &#8216;pro-porn&#8217;,&#8221; I&#8217;ll direct them here.</p>
<p>With your permission, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ascendingnode &#187; Rape Fantasy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>ascendingnode &#187; Rape Fantasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-776</guid>
		<description>[...] I was reading this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Feminists and came across the old argument about what &#8220;sex-positive&#8221; feminism is and whether sex-positive feminists are merely shills for the male gaze. One of the posts linked is arguing for sex-positive feminism and discusses whether the idea that women have &#8220;rape fantasies&#8221; is a myth or not. She writes, [The] claim that these fantasies are tantamount to women â€œgetting moist about people raping themâ€ is based on the reality of rape, rather than the idealized power play that the fantasizers wish to interact with. After all, a fantasy is, by definition, something not real&#8230; [W]hen people (sex-positive feminists or otherwise) talk about â€˜rape fantasiesâ€™ they are talking about role playing between consenting adults. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was reading this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Feminists and came across the old argument about what &#8220;sex-positive&#8221; feminism is and whether sex-positive feminists are merely shills for the male gaze. One of the posts linked is arguing for sex-positive feminism and discusses whether the idea that women have &#8220;rape fantasies&#8221; is a myth or not. She writes, [The] claim that these fantasies are tantamount to women â€œgetting moist about people raping themâ€ is based on the reality of rape, rather than the idealized power play that the fantasizers wish to interact with. After all, a fantasy is, by definition, something not real&#8230; [W]hen people (sex-positive feminists or otherwise) talk about â€˜rape fantasiesâ€™ they are talking about role playing between consenting adults. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gendergeek.org &#187; The Eighth Carnival of Feminists</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>gendergeek.org &#187; The Eighth Carnival of Feminists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-618</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrea (from Vociferate) sends out a challenge to so-called sex-positive feminists in &#8220;Do my boobs look empowering in this?&#8220;. Andrea (from Shrub.com) responds. Busy Nothings has reached a happy compromise, and owns both On Our Backs and Off Our Backs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrea (from Vociferate) sends out a challenge to so-called sex-positive feminists in &#8220;Do my boobs look empowering in this?&#8220;. Andrea (from Shrub.com) responds. Busy Nothings has reached a happy compromise, and owns both On Our Backs and Off Our Backs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epistaxis</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Epistaxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-615</guid>
		<description>The fact is the laissez-faire capitalism embraced by pornography's consumers, or advocates of consumers, far more closely resembles the right then any radical's fight to elimate pornography and prostitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is the laissez-faire capitalism embraced by pornography&#8217;s consumers, or advocates of consumers, far more closely resembles the right then any radical&#8217;s fight to elimate pornography and prostitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ascendingnode &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rape Fantasy?</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>ascendingnode &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rape Fantasy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-601</guid>
		<description>[...] I was reading this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Feminists and came across the old argument about what &#8220;sex-positive&#8221; feminism is and whether sex-positive feminists are merely shills for the male gaze. One of the posts linked is arguing for sex-positive feminism and discusses whether the idea that women have &#8220;rape fantasies&#8221; is a myth or not. She writes, [The] claim that these fantasies are tantamount to women â€œgetting moist about people raping themâ€ is based on the reality of rape, rather than the idealized power play that the fantasizers wish to interact with. After all, a fantasy is, by definition, something not real&#8230; [W]hen people (sex-positive feminists or otherwise) talk about â€˜rape fantasiesâ€™ they are talking about role playing between consenting adults. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was reading this week&#8217;s Carnival of the Feminists and came across the old argument about what &#8220;sex-positive&#8221; feminism is and whether sex-positive feminists are merely shills for the male gaze. One of the posts linked is arguing for sex-positive feminism and discusses whether the idea that women have &#8220;rape fantasies&#8221; is a myth or not. She writes, [The] claim that these fantasies are tantamount to women â€œgetting moist about people raping themâ€ is based on the reality of rape, rather than the idealized power play that the fantasizers wish to interact with. After all, a fantasy is, by definition, something not real&#8230; [W]hen people (sex-positive feminists or otherwise) talk about â€˜rape fantasiesâ€™ they are talking about role playing between consenting adults. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Can't argue with anything there.  

Another problem I have with POV's like the one quoted in the original post here,  which almost seems too obvious to mention:  that somehow, in the zeal to castigate all porn-lovers, what comes out of their mouths (and keyboards) often sounds to me far dirtier than any of the original material.  I mean, you can just as easily turn it around: if you're so disgusted by all this, why keep bringing it up?  And in a number of cases, not so much the above-quoted, but in the course of at least one flamewar I've been in recently: hello, imagery.  What  rape fantasies?  Whose rape fantasies?  *What on earth are you talking about?*   

"But doc, you're the one showing me all the dirty pictures!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t argue with anything there.  </p>
<p>Another problem I have with POV&#8217;s like the one quoted in the original post here,  which almost seems too obvious to mention:  that somehow, in the zeal to castigate all porn-lovers, what comes out of their mouths (and keyboards) often sounds to me far dirtier than any of the original material.  I mean, you can just as easily turn it around: if you&#8217;re so disgusted by all this, why keep bringing it up?  And in a number of cases, not so much the above-quoted, but in the course of at least one flamewar I&#8217;ve been in recently: hello, imagery.  What  rape fantasies?  Whose rape fantasies?  *What on earth are you talking about?*   </p>
<p>&#8220;But doc, you&#8217;re the one showing me all the dirty pictures!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Corinna</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Corinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-584</guid>
		<description>A friend and colleague just tossed this to me.  Beautifully done!

While, obviously, there's no one opinion on theis, and a million points of variation, and I'm not in agreement with EVERYTHING you said, this was wonderfully expressed and so nice to see.

And for the record, there are plenty of us out there who are not 100% anti-porn, who work in sexuality, and so forth able to have productive, fantastic discussion with other feminists who are more solidly against all porn, all sex work, etc.  Takes some doing and usually a lot of patience and communication on both 'sides" over time, but if it's any consolation, that's not a pipe dream.  It happens, and sometimes, it's really awesome. Seems to me you've made a great step in that direction here.

- HC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend and colleague just tossed this to me.  Beautifully done!</p>
<p>While, obviously, there&#8217;s no one opinion on theis, and a million points of variation, and I&#8217;m not in agreement with EVERYTHING you said, this was wonderfully expressed and so nice to see.</p>
<p>And for the record, there are plenty of us out there who are not 100% anti-porn, who work in sexuality, and so forth able to have productive, fantastic discussion with other feminists who are more solidly against all porn, all sex work, etc.  Takes some doing and usually a lot of patience and communication on both &#8217;sides&#8221; over time, but if it&#8217;s any consolation, that&#8217;s not a pipe dream.  It happens, and sometimes, it&#8217;s really awesome. Seems to me you&#8217;ve made a great step in that direction here.</p>
<p>- HC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitch &#124; Lab</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitch &#124; Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-01-29_132#comment-574</guid>
		<description>"Which brings me back to why I remarked on anal sex, BDSM and trans issues on a thread about sex positivity. While I agree with you that itâ€™s too late to have the term understood now to mean something other than pro-porn, I do not believe that means that discussion that starts about the term shouldnâ€™t broaden to encompass feminist view of sexual practice. I read you as saying that we should agree that â€œsex positiveâ€ as a term has nothing to offer and then stop; I disagree. Since Tekanjiâ€™s post wasnâ€™t limited to porn and prostitution, itâ€™s apparent that she doesnâ€™t think that discussion of sexual practice is off-topic either. And it is her thread." (Thomas)

Thanks for that Thomas.

I don't think the way to create a vocal and visible sex positive feminism is to argue with people who will never change their minds. 

However, I do think that the more sensible folks on each side of the debate ought to get together and create a way to actually have a productive discussion about its history -- where there are standards of evidence and argument -- and respectfulness.

I don't think that calling people "bad feminists" (and I'm not sure if anyone did) is a good idea, in other words. There are positions with which I don't agree, but "bad"? How could I possibly make that claim?

Finally, in many ways, "slut feminism" and so many other derogatory phrases to describe what's going on in popular culture is very much a creation of the media. I'm sure in a couple of years, someone will finally uncover this insidious piece of ideological framing, the way Faludi exposed the myth that women had a greater chance of being the target of a terrorist attack than she had of getting married past the age of, what was it?, 40?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Which brings me back to why I remarked on anal sex, BDSM and trans issues on a thread about sex positivity. While I agree with you that itâ€™s too late to have the term understood now to mean something other than pro-porn, I do not believe that means that discussion that starts about the term shouldnâ€™t broaden to encompass feminist view of sexual practice. I read you as saying that we should agree that â€œsex positiveâ€ as a term has nothing to offer and then stop; I disagree. Since Tekanjiâ€™s post wasnâ€™t limited to porn and prostitution, itâ€™s apparent that she doesnâ€™t think that discussion of sexual practice is off-topic either. And it is her thread.&#8221; (Thomas)</p>
<p>Thanks for that Thomas.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the way to create a vocal and visible sex positive feminism is to argue with people who will never change their minds. </p>
<p>However, I do think that the more sensible folks on each side of the debate ought to get together and create a way to actually have a productive discussion about its history &#8212; where there are standards of evidence and argument &#8212; and respectfulness.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that calling people &#8220;bad feminists&#8221; (and I&#8217;m not sure if anyone did) is a good idea, in other words. There are positions with which I don&#8217;t agree, but &#8220;bad&#8221;? How could I possibly make that claim?</p>
<p>Finally, in many ways, &#8220;slut feminism&#8221; and so many other derogatory phrases to describe what&#8217;s going on in popular culture is very much a creation of the media. I&#8217;m sure in a couple of years, someone will finally uncover this insidious piece of ideological framing, the way Faludi exposed the myth that women had a greater chance of being the target of a terrorist attack than she had of getting married past the age of, what was it?, 40?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
