<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War Against Non-Christians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The War on Non-Christian&#8217;s Newest Soldier: Spam</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-12454</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The War on Non-Christian&#8217;s Newest Soldier: Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-12454</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s the first one: A new comment on the post #93 &#8220;The War Against Non-Christians&#8221; is waiting for your approval http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s the first one: A new comment on the post #93 &#8220;The War Against Non-Christians&#8221; is waiting for your approval <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93" rel="nofollow">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-428</guid>
		<description>It continually amazes me how Christians in this country see the inclusion of others, in accordance with Jesus' message of tolerance, as an attack on themselves. If they were actually the minority and actually getting dissed, they would want the same sort of respect non-Christians want for their beliefs. Instead, they claim the godless atheists at the ACLU want to take away Christmas and ruin it for everyone. Everything is twisted in the view of these people, and if we don't read their minds for what holidays they celebrate, we're malicious fiends. What happened to that whole message of peace on earth and goodwill to all people? Even people who don't look or think or worship like you?

It's not like Christmas is even the only Christian holiday of the season, or that it falls on the same day for every sect (I'm thinking of Greek and Russian Orthodox, specifically). As I recall, the big celebration in many countries is at the Epiphany, two weeks after Christmas. What would Jesus do? I'd like to think he'd smite their asses with a stern, "Cut it out dudes! This is not what I meant!" As I recall, the only biblical story he got really angry during was when people were misusing the temple to serve themselves instead of God. This strikes me as in the same vein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It continually amazes me how Christians in this country see the inclusion of others, in accordance with Jesus&#8217; message of tolerance, as an attack on themselves. If they were actually the minority and actually getting dissed, they would want the same sort of respect non-Christians want for their beliefs. Instead, they claim the godless atheists at the ACLU want to take away Christmas and ruin it for everyone. Everything is twisted in the view of these people, and if we don&#8217;t read their minds for what holidays they celebrate, we&#8217;re malicious fiends. What happened to that whole message of peace on earth and goodwill to all people? Even people who don&#8217;t look or think or worship like you?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like Christmas is even the only Christian holiday of the season, or that it falls on the same day for every sect (I&#8217;m thinking of Greek and Russian Orthodox, specifically). As I recall, the big celebration in many countries is at the Epiphany, two weeks after Christmas. What would Jesus do? I&#8217;d like to think he&#8217;d smite their asses with a stern, &#8220;Cut it out dudes! This is not what I meant!&#8221; As I recall, the only biblical story he got really angry during was when people were misusing the temple to serve themselves instead of God. This strikes me as in the same vein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-427</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Itâ€™s not about not wanting anyone to say â€œMerry Christmasâ€, itâ€™s about not bullying people into saying it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, and see that I agree with. It should be choice to say "Merry Christmas", "Happy Holidays" or whatever you want. Policy to say &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt; is okay, I think (being the season and all), but not to limit them to only one thing and/or firing them for not compling with it. 

However, from your article I did not get that as the point (it seemed to me to only be about being annoyed that people were wishing you, as a Jew, a Merry Christmas) at all. I only know it from 1)Mom's rant and 2) your reply. I recommend (and was interested where that info came from anyway) either an addition to that post, or a follow up one that specifically addresses &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; (as I think it's valid) issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Itâ€™s not about not wanting anyone to say â€œMerry Christmasâ€, itâ€™s about not bullying people into saying it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, and see that I agree with. It should be choice to say &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221;, &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; or whatever you want. Policy to say <i>something</i> is okay, I think (being the season and all), but not to limit them to only one thing and/or firing them for not compling with it. </p>
<p>However, from your article I did not get that as the point (it seemed to me to only be about being annoyed that people were wishing you, as a Jew, a Merry Christmas) at all. I only know it from 1)Mom&#8217;s rant and 2) your reply. I recommend (and was interested where that info came from anyway) either an addition to that post, or a follow up one that specifically addresses <i>that</i> (as I think it&#8217;s valid) issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starfish</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Starfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-422</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://usinfo.state.gov/scv/life_and_culture.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Copied from the government website USINFO&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;USINFO delivers information about current U.S. foreign policy and about American life and culture. This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs
 
(Excerpt from Federal Holidays: Christmas):

Most Protestants and Roman Catholics and some Orthodox Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus on December 25. Before the 19th century, many Americans worked on Christmas, but in the industrial era the holiday began also to honor universal values, such as home, children and family life, and to incorporate secular customs like exchanging gifts and cards, and the decoration and display of evergreen "Christmas Trees." Congress proclaimed Christmas a federal holiday in 1870. In 1999, a federal court acknowledged these secular aspects in rejecting a claim that the holiday impermissibly endorsed and furthered a particular religious belief.
States and private employers are free to adopt their own holidays. Six of the federal legal holidaysâ€”New Year's Day; Washington's Birthday/Presidents' Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving and Christmasâ€”are observed nearly universally throughout the public and private sectors. States sometimes observe holidays not recognized by the federal government. New Jersey, for instance, observes Lincoln's Birthday, Good Friday and Election Day; Virginia celebrates Lee-Jackson Day, honoring Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas Jonathan ("Stonewall") Jackson, and the Day after Thanksgiving, affording state employees a four-day holiday weekend.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seems to me that Oâ€™Reilly, Fox, Falwell and other Christian fundamentalists are waging their war in all the wrong places. Doesnâ€™t it make more sense to confront Congress and the Supreme Court for officially proclaiming Christmas to be a religious &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; secular holiday rather than targeting U.S. citizens? 

BTW, while researching this topic I came across some great websites. There's the company that produced the movie &lt;a href="http://www.beyondbeliefmedia.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;â€œThe God Who Wasnâ€™t There.â€&lt;/a&gt; Also on this site was the directorâ€™s &lt;a href="http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian_flemming/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blog&lt;/a&gt;, which in turned linked to a refreshingly sensitive ctitique of the movie by a Christian:  (&lt;a href="http://amberheggestad.blogspot.com/2005/11/god-movie.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;â€œnice Christian criticism of the movieâ€&lt;/a&gt;) The site is still under construction and a little hard to navigate at the moment, but worth some effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://usinfo.state.gov/scv/life_and_culture.html" rel="nofollow">Copied from the government website USINFO</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>USINFO delivers information about current U.S. foreign policy and about American life and culture. This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State&#8217;s Bureau of International Information Programs</p>
<p>(Excerpt from Federal Holidays: Christmas):</p>
<p>Most Protestants and Roman Catholics and some Orthodox Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus on December 25. Before the 19th century, many Americans worked on Christmas, but in the industrial era the holiday began also to honor universal values, such as home, children and family life, and to incorporate secular customs like exchanging gifts and cards, and the decoration and display of evergreen &#8220;Christmas Trees.&#8221; Congress proclaimed Christmas a federal holiday in 1870. In 1999, a federal court acknowledged these secular aspects in rejecting a claim that the holiday impermissibly endorsed and furthered a particular religious belief.<br />
States and private employers are free to adopt their own holidays. Six of the federal legal holidaysâ€”New Year&#8217;s Day; Washington&#8217;s Birthday/Presidents&#8217; Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Thanksgiving and Christmasâ€”are observed nearly universally throughout the public and private sectors. States sometimes observe holidays not recognized by the federal government. New Jersey, for instance, observes Lincoln&#8217;s Birthday, Good Friday and Election Day; Virginia celebrates Lee-Jackson Day, honoring Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas Jonathan (&#8221;Stonewall&#8221;) Jackson, and the Day after Thanksgiving, affording state employees a four-day holiday weekend.</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems to me that Oâ€™Reilly, Fox, Falwell and other Christian fundamentalists are waging their war in all the wrong places. Doesnâ€™t it make more sense to confront Congress and the Supreme Court for officially proclaiming Christmas to be a religious <b>and</b> secular holiday rather than targeting U.S. citizens? </p>
<p>BTW, while researching this topic I came across some great websites. There&#8217;s the company that produced the movie <a href="http://www.beyondbeliefmedia.com/" rel="nofollow">â€œThe God Who Wasnâ€™t There.â€</a> Also on this site was the directorâ€™s <a href="http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian_flemming/" rel="nofollow">Blog</a>, which in turned linked to a refreshingly sensitive ctitique of the movie by a Christian:  (<a href="http://amberheggestad.blogspot.com/2005/11/god-movie.html" rel="nofollow">â€œnice Christian criticism of the movieâ€</a>) The site is still under construction and a little hard to navigate at the moment, but worth some effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Buffy, you missed the main thrust of my article, which was a biting critique on the so-called Christians who are using Christmas to try to rally conservatives by using the rhetoric of oppression to get people incensed about a holiday that is in no way, shape, or form under attack in the United States. Furthermore, it's a holiday that not all Christians celebrate, and during a time of year that has festivals from several different faiths, including the ones that spawned Christmas itself. 

And, yes, I am fucking annoyed to hear "Merry Christmas" now because they've made such an issue about it that companies have started making it &lt;i&gt;policy&lt;/i&gt; to say that instead of a generic term that includes everyone. And, furthermore, firing anyone who doesn't comply with those kinds of restrictions.

It's not about not wanting anyone to say "Merry Christmas", it's about not bullying people &lt;i&gt;into&lt;/i&gt; saying it. And that is what O'Reilly and his God Warriors are trying to do.

Re: Copy/Paste bug - I have &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; idea why the problem is occuring. It's an IE problem that I haven't been able to sit down and try to fix yet. Also, it appears to have happened only with a newer version, as my laptop (as of the last time I checked) could highlight stuff fine. Sorry about the issue, but in my opinion it's just another strike against IE and it's crappy construction. I'll fix it as soon as I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffy, you missed the main thrust of my article, which was a biting critique on the so-called Christians who are using Christmas to try to rally conservatives by using the rhetoric of oppression to get people incensed about a holiday that is in no way, shape, or form under attack in the United States. Furthermore, it&#8217;s a holiday that not all Christians celebrate, and during a time of year that has festivals from several different faiths, including the ones that spawned Christmas itself. </p>
<p>And, yes, I am fucking annoyed to hear &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221; now because they&#8217;ve made such an issue about it that companies have started making it <i>policy</i> to say that instead of a generic term that includes everyone. And, furthermore, firing anyone who doesn&#8217;t comply with those kinds of restrictions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about not wanting anyone to say &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221;, it&#8217;s about not bullying people <i>into</i> saying it. And that is what O&#8217;Reilly and his God Warriors are trying to do.</p>
<p>Re: Copy/Paste bug - I have <i>no</i> idea why the problem is occuring. It&#8217;s an IE problem that I haven&#8217;t been able to sit down and try to fix yet. Also, it appears to have happened only with a newer version, as my laptop (as of the last time I checked) could highlight stuff fine. Sorry about the issue, but in my opinion it&#8217;s just another strike against IE and it&#8217;s crappy construction. I&#8217;ll fix it as soon as I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-20_93#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=93#comment-420</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By now, Iâ€™m sure yâ€™all have heard about the so-called War on Christmas. Because, you know, Christians in America are an oppressed group. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

In my opinion, it has nothing to do with being an â€˜oppressedâ€™ group at all. It has everything to do with trying to take the religious aspect out of a &lt;i&gt;religious&lt;/i&gt; holiday. Okay, yes, a lot of people celebrate it with nothing at all to do with the religion and wouldnâ€™t know any of the significance behind most of it, but it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; about the Christian faith. You know &lt;i&gt;Christ&lt;/i&gt;mas. 

I donâ€™t even think itâ€™s a PC thing. I am all for being PC and including the other religious celebrations this time of year (Jewish, Bahi, etc.), but I wouldnâ€™t expect them to be down played, what I expect is for them to be &lt;i&gt;included&lt;/i&gt; as they are. It is not PC in my view to say â€œHappy Holidaysâ€, that is just covering all your bases so you donâ€™t leave someone out. PC is to say â€œMerry Christmas and Happy Hanukahâ€. Now, if you are saying â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ because it is less of a mouthful and includes all the ones you may not know/remember, well, thatâ€™s fine, but I think trying to force people to only use â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ if they are actually celebrating Christmas is not right. Same way as forcing someone to use â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ if they celebrating Hanukah. So long as you are expressing what &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; are celebrating with whatever significance it has to you, then I think everyone else should just stay out of it. 
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;I was on the phone with the representative and after we had resolved everything she said, â€œHaâ€¦ Merry Christmas.â€ &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now, here, see, again, I just donâ€™t find there to be an issue if &lt;i&gt;she&lt;/i&gt; was celebrating Christmas so wished you a nice one. I am sure in this case it was just a company thing, and in the interest of having no clue who their customers are, yes, â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ probably would have been better to cover it all. I look at it as if someone wished me a â€œHappy Hanukahâ€ I would not mind. I would take it as them wishing me holiday cheer in the form that they experience it. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™d just like to give a big â€œthumbs downâ€ to Safeway/Hallmark for excluding me, my family, and our non-Christian friends with your Christian-only holiday cards. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, it was probably the store, not Hallmark. I say that because there are a crap load of Hanukah ones on our shelves down here. Okay, well, not as many as the Merry Christmas, but there &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; options. Yes, they should have had some, but my guess is the manager just did not think to stock them, especially if the area is not one with much demand for them. Itâ€™s all about what they can sell. 

My point being that I think it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an issue to try and remove the religious (and Christmas/Hanukah/whatever &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; religious, no matter how commercialized they have become) significance of &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; faithâ€™s holiday, whatever that is. PC is to sit there and list them all. Generic greetings are a nice way to be safe if you donâ€™t want to list or have no clue, but I donâ€™t think itâ€™s rude to wish someone whatever you celebrate and if you get wished a merry/happy something you donâ€™t, well, I just donâ€™t think itâ€™s anyone trying to force something down your throat. Itâ€™s just the time of year and people being nice and cheery for like the two weeks out of the year that most people donâ€™t seem to hate the rest of the human race.  

(and totally aside- why the hell canâ€™t I copy an entire article so I can paste it into a more convenient editor for responding? It only lets me copy one paragraph at a time or it just highlights everything &lt;i&gt;but&lt;/i&gt; the article)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By now, Iâ€™m sure yâ€™all have heard about the so-called War on Christmas. Because, you know, Christians in America are an oppressed group. </p></blockquote>
<p>In my opinion, it has nothing to do with being an â€˜oppressedâ€™ group at all. It has everything to do with trying to take the religious aspect out of a <i>religious</i> holiday. Okay, yes, a lot of people celebrate it with nothing at all to do with the religion and wouldnâ€™t know any of the significance behind most of it, but it <i>is</i> about the Christian faith. You know <i>Christ</i>mas. </p>
<p>I donâ€™t even think itâ€™s a PC thing. I am all for being PC and including the other religious celebrations this time of year (Jewish, Bahi, etc.), but I wouldnâ€™t expect them to be down played, what I expect is for them to be <i>included</i> as they are. It is not PC in my view to say â€œHappy Holidaysâ€, that is just covering all your bases so you donâ€™t leave someone out. PC is to say â€œMerry Christmas and Happy Hanukahâ€. Now, if you are saying â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ because it is less of a mouthful and includes all the ones you may not know/remember, well, thatâ€™s fine, but I think trying to force people to only use â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ if they are actually celebrating Christmas is not right. Same way as forcing someone to use â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ if they celebrating Hanukah. So long as you are expressing what <i>you</i> are celebrating with whatever significance it has to you, then I think everyone else should just stay out of it. </p>
<blockquote><p>I was on the phone with the representative and after we had resolved everything she said, â€œHaâ€¦ Merry Christmas.â€ </p></blockquote>
<p>Now, here, see, again, I just donâ€™t find there to be an issue if <i>she</i> was celebrating Christmas so wished you a nice one. I am sure in this case it was just a company thing, and in the interest of having no clue who their customers are, yes, â€œHappy Holidaysâ€ probably would have been better to cover it all. I look at it as if someone wished me a â€œHappy Hanukahâ€ I would not mind. I would take it as them wishing me holiday cheer in the form that they experience it. </p>
<blockquote><p>Iâ€™d just like to give a big â€œthumbs downâ€ to Safeway/Hallmark for excluding me, my family, and our non-Christian friends with your Christian-only holiday cards. </p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, it was probably the store, not Hallmark. I say that because there are a crap load of Hanukah ones on our shelves down here. Okay, well, not as many as the Merry Christmas, but there <i>are</i> options. Yes, they should have had some, but my guess is the manager just did not think to stock them, especially if the area is not one with much demand for them. Itâ€™s all about what they can sell. </p>
<p>My point being that I think it <i>is</i> an issue to try and remove the religious (and Christmas/Hanukah/whatever <i>are</i> religious, no matter how commercialized they have become) significance of <i>any</i> faithâ€™s holiday, whatever that is. PC is to sit there and list them all. Generic greetings are a nice way to be safe if you donâ€™t want to list or have no clue, but I donâ€™t think itâ€™s rude to wish someone whatever you celebrate and if you get wished a merry/happy something you donâ€™t, well, I just donâ€™t think itâ€™s anyone trying to force something down your throat. Itâ€™s just the time of year and people being nice and cheery for like the two weeks out of the year that most people donâ€™t seem to hate the rest of the human race.  </p>
<p>(and totally aside- why the hell canâ€™t I copy an entire article so I can paste it into a more convenient editor for responding? It only lets me copy one paragraph at a time or it just highlights everything <i>but</i> the article)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
