<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acknowledging Inersections: MRA&#8217;s, Feminists, and Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems that the whole mail order bride issue has morphed into a court battle at the federal level.  These guys are the biggest trouble makers - 

http://www.online-dating-rights.com/forum/index.php

The irony is that the fight between the feminists and MRA's is over restrictions on communications between American men and "non-feminist" foreign women as these men are attempting to avoid American feminist women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems that the whole mail order bride issue has morphed into a court battle at the federal level.  These guys are the biggest trouble makers - </p>
<p><a href="http://www.online-dating-rights.com/forum/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.online-dating-rights.com/forum/index.php</a></p>
<p>The irony is that the fight between the feminists and MRA&#8217;s is over restrictions on communications between American men and &#8220;non-feminist&#8221; foreign women as these men are attempting to avoid American feminist women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidelbogen</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidelbogen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-339</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;[Administrator notice: This comment has been removed.]&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>[Administrator notice: This comment has been removed.]</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-331</guid>
		<description>1) I'm not here to educate you about the basic terms of feminism. You want to learn about the patriarchy then read a book on feminism or visit &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist_101/" rel="nofollow"&gt;feminist_101&lt;/a&gt;.

2) Although this is a dead thread, your "serious point" is not related to the overall point I was trying to make and therefore I don't see why I shouldn't treat it as an attempt to de-rail the thread.

3) You're toeing the line of acceptability with your condescending tone, blatant disrespect of my beliefs, and privileged attitude (coming onto my blogspace and acting like I owe you answers to &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt;). This is your one, and only, warning. Any further post written in the style of the two above &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be deleted.

If you want to discuss something relevant to the thread, then make your case in a polite way. Keep in mind, however, that this is not a discussion board. This is &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; space and if you can't play nice with me then I have no problem not letting you play at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I&#8217;m not here to educate you about the basic terms of feminism. You want to learn about the patriarchy then read a book on feminism or visit <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist_101/" rel="nofollow">feminist_101</a>.</p>
<p>2) Although this is a dead thread, your &#8220;serious point&#8221; is not related to the overall point I was trying to make and therefore I don&#8217;t see why I shouldn&#8217;t treat it as an attempt to de-rail the thread.</p>
<p>3) You&#8217;re toeing the line of acceptability with your condescending tone, blatant disrespect of my beliefs, and privileged attitude (coming onto my blogspace and acting like I owe you answers to <i>anything</i>). This is your one, and only, warning. Any further post written in the style of the two above <i>will</i> be deleted.</p>
<p>If you want to discuss something relevant to the thread, then make your case in a polite way. Keep in mind, however, that this is not a discussion board. This is <i>my</i> space and if you can&#8217;t play nice with me then I have no problem not letting you play at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidelbogen</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidelbogen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-330</guid>
		<description>So sorry to violate feminism's cognitive bubble....

The point, however, is serious. And unlike a bubble, it will not pop and vanish....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sorry to violate feminism&#8217;s cognitive bubble&#8230;.</p>
<p>The point, however, is serious. And unlike a bubble, it will not pop and vanish&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-324</guid>
		<description>My blog is a feminist blog. If you don't want to interact with feminist terms, then don't comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog is a feminist blog. If you don&#8217;t want to interact with feminist terms, then don&#8217;t comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidelbogen</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidelbogen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I put this as an open question to all the world:

On what irrefutable moral foundation or infallible chain of demonstration are we compelled to acknowledge "patriarchy" as a valid data model?

*****

(Drumming my fingers on the table top, to the accompaniment of a ticking clock across the empty, ice-cold room.......)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put this as an open question to all the world:</p>
<p>On what irrefutable moral foundation or infallible chain of demonstration are we compelled to acknowledge &#8220;patriarchy&#8221; as a valid data model?</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>(Drumming my fingers on the table top, to the accompaniment of a ticking clock across the empty, ice-cold room&#8230;&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-213</guid>
		<description>What you pointed out is exactly the problem I've run into with many MRA advocates. I think, in essence, we all want the right to live our lives happily, but unfortunately those MRA's don't seem to be able to understand that their perceived goals of happiness would take away the happiness of many other people. 

And, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that there's nothing good about MRA groups or individuals. The discussion on Hugo's blog ended up focusing on abuse and support networks for victims. Many of the MRA's who spoke up were victims of abuse and had been treated badly when seeking help. I was aruging that their experiences, while valid, did not mean that they should demonize an entire movement (feminism). 

Many of them were involved with setting up shelters and hotlines and stuff for male victims. I think that's great, especially since one of the arguments that feminsts use in regards to male victims in women's shelters is that men should set up their own safe spaces. I see the rationale behind the feminist argument, though sometimes I think the delivery was hostile rather than helpful. I absolutely support safe spaces that are tailored to support the particular victim in question, and I think it would be great if on a macro level all kinds of shelters could work together to provide greater understanding and support for all victims.

I guess what I want is for everyone to be able to work together to achieve equal opportunities and rights for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you pointed out is exactly the problem I&#8217;ve run into with many MRA advocates. I think, in essence, we all want the right to live our lives happily, but unfortunately those MRA&#8217;s don&#8217;t seem to be able to understand that their perceived goals of happiness would take away the happiness of many other people. </p>
<p>And, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not saying that there&#8217;s nothing good about MRA groups or individuals. The discussion on Hugo&#8217;s blog ended up focusing on abuse and support networks for victims. Many of the MRA&#8217;s who spoke up were victims of abuse and had been treated badly when seeking help. I was aruging that their experiences, while valid, did not mean that they should demonize an entire movement (feminism). </p>
<p>Many of them were involved with setting up shelters and hotlines and stuff for male victims. I think that&#8217;s great, especially since one of the arguments that feminsts use in regards to male victims in women&#8217;s shelters is that men should set up their own safe spaces. I see the rationale behind the feminist argument, though sometimes I think the delivery was hostile rather than helpful. I absolutely support safe spaces that are tailored to support the particular victim in question, and I think it would be great if on a macro level all kinds of shelters could work together to provide greater understanding and support for all victims.</p>
<p>I guess what I want is for everyone to be able to work together to achieve equal opportunities and rights for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post. Thanks. I agree absolutely that patriarchy oppresses men. The MRAs seem to want to return to a nostalgic vision of nineteenth-century "seperate spheres." Their solution to their problems is to oppress &lt;i&gt;everyone&lt;/i&gt; beneath the gender caste system you describe, rather than try and work with women towards true equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post. Thanks. I agree absolutely that patriarchy oppresses men. The MRAs seem to want to return to a nostalgic vision of nineteenth-century &#8220;seperate spheres.&#8221; Their solution to their problems is to oppress <i>everyone</i> beneath the gender caste system you describe, rather than try and work with women towards true equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyce</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-09-26_54#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=54#comment-206</guid>
		<description>dang... come back on teh 10th.. i think that day is a holiday!  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dang&#8230; come back on teh 10th.. i think that day is a holiday!  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
