<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad, tekanji, bad!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=38#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Well, part of the point with Firefox is that it&#039;s more picky about being WC3 compatible. Meaning that if things look right on the user&#039;s end in FF, they should look right in IE, but it&#039;s rarely the reverse. Which is one reason why this problem is so weird - I have &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; idea what the original author could have done to make it fubar like that. Suffice it to say, aside from grabbing my link code, I&#039;m going to be doing this from the ground up. It&#039;ll also be WC3 compatible which means it should display well enough on all browsers, not just IE and FF.

I read the second link you gave (the fonts on LLN didn&#039;t anti-alias properly so it was giving me a headache to read it) and it was quite interesting. Even if I didn&#039;t agree with what was said, I&#039;d probably stick to one blog (well, the blog and my tri-monthly Shrub.com article - speaking of which I need to update it...) &#039;cause I update this puppy too infrequently as it is. It gives me images of having five different blogs all updated once a year LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, part of the point with Firefox is that it&#8217;s more picky about being WC3 compatible. Meaning that if things look right on the user&#8217;s end in FF, they should look right in IE, but it&#8217;s rarely the reverse. Which is one reason why this problem is so weird &#8211; I have <i>no</i> idea what the original author could have done to make it fubar like that. Suffice it to say, aside from grabbing my link code, I&#8217;m going to be doing this from the ground up. It&#8217;ll also be WC3 compatible which means it should display well enough on all browsers, not just IE and FF.</p>
<p>I read the second link you gave (the fonts on LLN didn&#8217;t anti-alias properly so it was giving me a headache to read it) and it was quite interesting. Even if I didn&#8217;t agree with what was said, I&#8217;d probably stick to one blog (well, the blog and my tri-monthly Shrub.com article &#8211; speaking of which I need to update it&#8230;) &#8217;cause I update this puppy too infrequently as it is. It gives me images of having five different blogs all updated once a year LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sour Duck</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Sour Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=38#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Firefox may be superior in almost every way, but from a user-end, I switched back and forth between your blog in IE and Firefox, and it looks almost identical. Some of the proportions of the page layout alter very slightly, but that&#039;s it. (E.g, the white box spaces shift slightly when I flip from IE to Firefox and back again.)

Although I agree with the &quot;blue company&quot; point. :)

RE: removal of &quot;part-time hypocrite&quot; stamp - :D . Good for you.

And regarding the third part in the Girls and Game Ads series - I&#039;m not looking at my watch, tapping my foot. Because I subscribe to your blog through Bloglines (rather than bookmarking your blog in a web browser and checking it every day for new posts), I figure when it arrives, it arrives. :)

BTW, I&#039;m typing this comment in Firefox and you&#039;re right, from a user end this *is* superior in at least one respect: it doesn&#039;t chop off my text as I&#039;m typing (as Kristy notes).

RE: your and Kristy&#039;s musings about whether to split stuff off into another blog according to subject matter. There are a couple of very good pieces I&#039;ve read lately:

Learning the Lessons of Nixon, &quot;Be True to Your Blog&quot; (but I always think of it as &quot;I say unto you, fellow blogger: Donâ€™t start another blog.&quot;), http://www.cadence90.com/wp/?p=2241

Half Changed World, &quot;In praise of uncategorizable blogs&quot;, http://www.halfchangedworld.com/2005/08/in_praise_of_un.html

I&#039;m pretty sure I disagree with LLN, but it&#039;s so persuasive...! Half Changed World *really* convinces me, using the example of Mommybloggers and politics.

(I&#039;m going to put both in my de.licio.us bookmarks page - if you&#039;re interested, here: http://del.icio.us/sourduck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox may be superior in almost every way, but from a user-end, I switched back and forth between your blog in IE and Firefox, and it looks almost identical. Some of the proportions of the page layout alter very slightly, but that&#8217;s it. (E.g, the white box spaces shift slightly when I flip from IE to Firefox and back again.)</p>
<p>Although I agree with the &#8220;blue company&#8221; point. <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>RE: removal of &#8220;part-time hypocrite&#8221; stamp &#8211; <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  . Good for you.</p>
<p>And regarding the third part in the Girls and Game Ads series &#8211; I&#8217;m not looking at my watch, tapping my foot. Because I subscribe to your blog through Bloglines (rather than bookmarking your blog in a web browser and checking it every day for new posts), I figure when it arrives, it arrives. <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m typing this comment in Firefox and you&#8217;re right, from a user end this *is* superior in at least one respect: it doesn&#8217;t chop off my text as I&#8217;m typing (as Kristy notes).</p>
<p>RE: your and Kristy&#8217;s musings about whether to split stuff off into another blog according to subject matter. There are a couple of very good pieces I&#8217;ve read lately:</p>
<p>Learning the Lessons of Nixon, &#8220;Be True to Your Blog&#8221; (but I always think of it as &#8220;I say unto you, fellow blogger: Donâ€™t start another blog.&#8221;), <a href="http://www.cadence90.com/wp/?p=2241" rel="nofollow">http://www.cadence90.com/wp/?p=2241</a></p>
<p>Half Changed World, &#8220;In praise of uncategorizable blogs&#8221;, <a href="http://www.halfchangedworld.com/2005/08/in_praise_of_un.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.halfchangedworld.com/2005/08/in_praise_of_un.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I disagree with LLN, but it&#8217;s so persuasive&#8230;! Half Changed World *really* convinces me, using the example of Mommybloggers and politics.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m going to put both in my de.licio.us bookmarks page &#8211; if you&#8217;re interested, here: <a href="http://del.icio.us/sourduck" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/sourduck</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tekanji</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=38#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I have no idea why it has that IE bug. I didn&#039;t code this layout in the first place (modified it from one I found) and it&#039;s designed to work in Firefox (which I use). While I always recommend getting Firefox - it&#039;s superior in almost every way to IE and is from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://utopianhell.com/blog/shop-smart-shop-blue&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blue company&lt;/a&gt; - when I redesign It&#039;ll be WC3 compatible, tested in Firefox, IE, Slimbrowser, and Opera.

As for the tubal, I&#039;ll be sure to share all the gory details }:&gt; The doc actually is supposed to give me some pictures of the inside job, so I may post them. Or if I&#039;m nicer I&#039;ll just link them so ye of the faint heart won&#039;t be forced to look at my insides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why it has that IE bug. I didn&#8217;t code this layout in the first place (modified it from one I found) and it&#8217;s designed to work in Firefox (which I use). While I always recommend getting Firefox &#8211; it&#8217;s superior in almost every way to IE and is from a <a href="http://utopianhell.com/blog/shop-smart-shop-blue" rel="nofollow">blue company</a> &#8211; when I redesign It&#8217;ll be WC3 compatible, tested in Firefox, IE, Slimbrowser, and Opera.</p>
<p>As for the tubal, I&#8217;ll be sure to share all the gory details }:&gt; The doc actually is supposed to give me some pictures of the inside job, so I may post them. Or if I&#8217;m nicer I&#8217;ll just link them so ye of the faint heart won&#8217;t be forced to look at my insides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-08-31_38#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=38#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I was actually thinking about making two seperate blogs-one
personal and one for more politcal/social issues. But then i
remebered the personal is poltical and vice versa motto.

Speaking of your blog layout, why does the comment section hide
some of the words towards the ends of the box? I don&#039;t like not
seeing what i&#039;m writing (i make way too many typos) and hence
they come out all over the place like this one.

Would love to hear more about the tubal ligation, i&#039;m intrigued!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually thinking about making two seperate blogs-one<br />
personal and one for more politcal/social issues. But then i<br />
remebered the personal is poltical and vice versa motto.</p>
<p>Speaking of your blog layout, why does the comment section hide<br />
some of the words towards the ends of the box? I don&#8217;t like not<br />
seeing what i&#8217;m writing (i make way too many typos) and hence<br />
they come out all over the place like this one.</p>
<p>Would love to hear more about the tubal ligation, i&#8217;m intrigued!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
