My Body, My Morals

Amanda over at Pandagon takes on the “morality” of the so-called “conscience clause” pharmacists. I’ve been trying for so long to explain that someone else’s morality should in no way trump my morality when it comes to issues of my body, but I think Amanda has really hit the issue at its heart.

As a staunchly childfree woman, I need to remember this one for when I start trying to find a doctor who will sterilize me:

Having baby after baby would be wicked of me. I cannot provide for one child, much less 6 to a dozen. And it’s not just a money issue. My boyfriend and I are both crazy busy people who barely squeeze in time to feed and play with our cats, so a baby would certainly suffer at our hands. I have strong beliefs that one should only have children if you are committed to raising that child up the best you can, and since I can’t do that for a child, I feel it would be immoral of me to have one.

Amanda’s right; it is, in my moral code at least, completely immoral to have a child you cannot and/or will not properly take care of. For someone like me, who never wants kids, I have the option of permanent sterilization (if I can find a doctor willing to perform it on a young, childless woman). For others, though, it’s not that they never want a baby, but that they don’t want one right now. For them, using birth control is the only moral choice. And I, for one, stand by that choice: children should be a product of an informed decision, not an accident due to negligence!

The religious right steps up and says, “If you don’t want children then practice abstinence, you immoral slut!” That’s all well and good for some people, but not for me. I may be childfree, but I’m not asexual. My moral code says that I need to do what it takes to keep myself, my partners, and my relationships healthy and happy. For me, that means that I will engage in safe sex as part of that happiness regimen.

And frankly, it’s stupid and immoral to expect me to prioritize the precepts of a religion I don’t follow that worships a deity I don’t believe in over the well-being of myself and my partner.

I could write an article on this line alone, but suffice it to say that Amanda has summarized one of my biggest critiques about the conservative government currently in power. I must say that I’m heartily sick of this so-called “moral” legislation which is “the only morals are my morals.” Really, it’s not so hard of a concept to say that “as long as my morals hurt no one, then they should be protected.” Don’t like BC? Fine, don’t use it! But stay the hell out of my way when I want it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
This entry was posted in Conservative, Feminism, Religion, Reproductive Rights, Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to My Body, My Morals

  1. Pingback: Official Shrub.com Blog » Blog Archive » Think women have achieved equality? Think again.

  2. butcherbaby says:

    The religious right steps up and says, “If you don’t want children then practice abstinence, you immoral slut!”

    this sentence alone is what makes me most crazy about the religious right and their perceptions of morality. first of all, why is it only the WOMEN having sex that are addressed? obviously a woman does not get pregnant on her own. where’s the vilification for the guys who have a part in this? do they just think that all these “immoral sluts” just run around seducing all the chaste and innocent men? the mind boggles.

    second of all….and this chaps my hide even more….how do they think this applies to MARRIED couples (who i assume they approve of having sex)? as if the only people who do not want to have children- perhaps not now, perhaps never- are unmarried immoral sluts? do they really think that all married couples either 1. want to have kids 2. want to have kids RIGHT AWAY 3. want to have as many kids as physically possible 4. should never have sex unless they are trying for children?
    all of those assumptions are mind blowing, but especially number four. and i have asked this question many times of anti-abortionists/religious conservatives. not only do they notive me a satisfying answer, they don’t address this issue AT ALL. i guess because it doesn’t fit in with their agenda of persecuting all the “immoral sluts”.

  3. Pingback: Male Privilege vs. Female Privilege | AlekNovy

Comments are closed.