<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pirates of the Caribbean II and the Tradition of Racial Oppression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-170763</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-170763</guid>
		<description>Well Disney does it again. Their new movie Prince of Persia has cast a white British actress, Gemma Arterton, to play the East Indian role of Princess Farrah. Why can’t they cast an east Indian actress. There lots of them in the US and in Britain with more credits on their resumes than this actress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Disney does it again. Their new movie Prince of Persia has cast a white British actress, Gemma Arterton, to play the East Indian role of Princess Farrah. Why can’t they cast an east Indian actress. There lots of them in the US and in Britain with more credits on their resumes than this actress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-80235</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-80235</guid>
		<description>*WARNING contains spoilers for II"
My view on Elizabeth's marriage comment: If taken out of context of the movie plot and the time frame in which it is set could be considered offensive.

And yet, in the 1700's, a woman's only choice was to marry, and marry well. Elizabeth (the Govenor's Daughter!) in choosing to marry for love –  and to a blacksmith's apprentice and son of a pirate no less – instead of social standing shows a great deal of backbone. 

Don't forget, when she threatned Lord Cutler Beckett, she accused him of robbing her of her wedding NIGHT, not wedding DAY.  She's not a modern day bridezilla whining about her place settings, but a woman ready to be with the one she loved. The wedding was just the means to an end.

And I think too much has been read into that phrase... anyone who had their wedding interrupted by soldiers and arrested with a death sentence, then escaped by dressing as a 
boy and ending up on a pirate ship hunted by a giant sea monster should be forgiven for wishing momentarily that things had gone according to the original, simple plan. haha. :)

On another note, I am curious what the original posters who objected to Tia Dalma think about her true identy that is revealed in III? I'm not sure what to think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*WARNING contains spoilers for II&#8221;<br />
My view on Elizabeth&#8217;s marriage comment: If taken out of context of the movie plot and the time frame in which it is set could be considered offensive.</p>
<p>And yet, in the 1700&#8217;s, a woman&#8217;s only choice was to marry, and marry well. Elizabeth (the Govenor&#8217;s Daughter!) in choosing to marry for love –  and to a blacksmith&#8217;s apprentice and son of a pirate no less – instead of social standing shows a great deal of backbone. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget, when she threatned Lord Cutler Beckett, she accused him of robbing her of her wedding NIGHT, not wedding DAY.  She&#8217;s not a modern day bridezilla whining about her place settings, but a woman ready to be with the one she loved. The wedding was just the means to an end.</p>
<p>And I think too much has been read into that phrase&#8230; anyone who had their wedding interrupted by soldiers and arrested with a death sentence, then escaped by dressing as a<br />
boy and ending up on a pirate ship hunted by a giant sea monster should be forgiven for wishing momentarily that things had gone according to the original, simple plan. haha. <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On another note, I am curious what the original posters who objected to Tia Dalma think about her true identy that is revealed in III? I&#8217;m not sure what to think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-43368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-43368</guid>
		<description>I only just rented Pirates II last weekend, so I'm glad I didn't find this before today. ^^

&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, as much as Elizabeth totally rocked for most of this movie, at one point she sums up her feelings on the entire situation by saying â€œI just thought Iâ€™d be married by nowâ€. I realize that the lineâ€™s in there to give Jack a chance to hit on her, and to develop the Jack/Elizabeth plotline, butâ€¦ it kinda pissed me off. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, that made my skin crawl.  Big time.  It's all this blog's fault. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only just rented Pirates II last weekend, so I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t find this before today. ^^</p>
<blockquote><p>Also, as much as Elizabeth totally rocked for most of this movie, at one point she sums up her feelings on the entire situation by saying â€œI just thought Iâ€™d be married by nowâ€. I realize that the lineâ€™s in there to give Jack a chance to hit on her, and to develop the Jack/Elizabeth plotline, butâ€¦ it kinda pissed me off. </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, that made my skin crawl.  Big time.  It&#8217;s all this blog&#8217;s fault. <img src='http://blog.shrub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigel Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-20735</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigel Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-20735</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Freaky Lara&lt;/b&gt;: I'm going to toss in my two cents here, even though it isn't my post and I can't speak for Ariel.

I'm not sure how you can say that &lt;i&gt;Pirates&lt;/i&gt; was not offensive, yet still see the point of the Taino council. The council directly criticizes the film for falsely portraying their people as "savage cannibals." I think that's plenty reason to consider the movie offensive.

I actually haven't seen &lt;i&gt;Borat&lt;/i&gt;, so I can't say. Some people have suggested that the movie is a smart satire of anti-Semitism, so if that were the case, I would be okay with it. Otherwise, it's just another cheap use of racism/ethnocentrism for the sake of "humor."

&lt;blockquote&gt;I have to disagree with you that Johnny Depp would engage in celebrating White theft in a bigoted sense. He has put his career on the line to criticize Americaâ€™s bigoted foreign policy so I really doubt that his heart contains White supremacy in it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just because a person commits some anti-racist actions doesn't mean that s/he is completely free of racism. Getting rid of one's ingrained racism is a long (perhaps lifelong) process. Johnny Depp doesn't get a free pass for accusations of racism just because he does some (very good) work in a different arena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Freaky Lara</b>: I&#8217;m going to toss in my two cents here, even though it isn&#8217;t my post and I can&#8217;t speak for Ariel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you can say that <i>Pirates</i> was not offensive, yet still see the point of the Taino council. The council directly criticizes the film for falsely portraying their people as &#8220;savage cannibals.&#8221; I think that&#8217;s plenty reason to consider the movie offensive.</p>
<p>I actually haven&#8217;t seen <i>Borat</i>, so I can&#8217;t say. Some people have suggested that the movie is a smart satire of anti-Semitism, so if that were the case, I would be okay with it. Otherwise, it&#8217;s just another cheap use of racism/ethnocentrism for the sake of &#8220;humor.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>I have to disagree with you that Johnny Depp would engage in celebrating White theft in a bigoted sense. He has put his career on the line to criticize Americaâ€™s bigoted foreign policy so I really doubt that his heart contains White supremacy in it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just because a person commits some anti-racist actions doesn&#8217;t mean that s/he is completely free of racism. Getting rid of one&#8217;s ingrained racism is a long (perhaps lifelong) process. Johnny Depp doesn&#8217;t get a free pass for accusations of racism just because he does some (very good) work in a different arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freaky Lara</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-19481</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-19481</guid>
		<description>I'm Latino, my gf is Black, and my daughter is White.  We watched Pirates 2 and none of us found it offensive.  I do, however see the point of the Taino council.  From that perspective, would you then encourage a boycot on Sascha Baror Cohen as well for his stereotyping of Khazic people?  I have to disagree with you that Johnny Depp would engage in celebrating White theft in a bigoted sense.  He has put his career on the line to criticize America's bigoted foreign policy so I really doubt that his heart contains White supremacy in it.  Please reply to me at FreakmasterL@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Latino, my gf is Black, and my daughter is White.  We watched Pirates 2 and none of us found it offensive.  I do, however see the point of the Taino council.  From that perspective, would you then encourage a boycot on Sascha Baror Cohen as well for his stereotyping of Khazic people?  I have to disagree with you that Johnny Depp would engage in celebrating White theft in a bigoted sense.  He has put his career on the line to criticize America&#8217;s bigoted foreign policy so I really doubt that his heart contains White supremacy in it.  Please reply to me at <a href="mailto:FreakmasterL@yahoo.com">FreakmasterL@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Minter</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-17189</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Minter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-17189</guid>
		<description>I loved the Pirates II. I love the characters, especially Jack and Tia. If I am not mistaken, both are possibly cast as Jamaicans? They are certainly the heroes.  I could swear I've seen or known them somehow before. Am I out of my tree or are these characters somehow cast in the Rastafarai tradition? I guess it would make sense, Port Royal was in Jamaica and was used as a base for the British royalty before it fell into the ocean during an earthquake. I certainly don't like the inside of the casket shooting of the bird and I think this action doesn't go well with the rest of the movie as these people are just trying to co-exist as they try to avoid a fuss or physical fight. The use of the symbol of the East Indian trading company is certainly interesting and I know that symbols are ever so important in the "schisms" of things. With the way we are going on our planet I think Jack and Tia may have the answer-look inside ourselves for solutions. I hope that the "you and I are really alike" or the "I and you" really mean the "I and I" in a universal plea to all mankind that we are all one family and should try to get along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Pirates II. I love the characters, especially Jack and Tia. If I am not mistaken, both are possibly cast as Jamaicans? They are certainly the heroes.  I could swear I&#8217;ve seen or known them somehow before. Am I out of my tree or are these characters somehow cast in the Rastafarai tradition? I guess it would make sense, Port Royal was in Jamaica and was used as a base for the British royalty before it fell into the ocean during an earthquake. I certainly don&#8217;t like the inside of the casket shooting of the bird and I think this action doesn&#8217;t go well with the rest of the movie as these people are just trying to co-exist as they try to avoid a fuss or physical fight. The use of the symbol of the East Indian trading company is certainly interesting and I know that symbols are ever so important in the &#8220;schisms&#8221; of things. With the way we are going on our planet I think Jack and Tia may have the answer-look inside ourselves for solutions. I hope that the &#8220;you and I are really alike&#8221; or the &#8220;I and you&#8221; really mean the &#8220;I and I&#8221; in a universal plea to all mankind that we are all one family and should try to get along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie lunn</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie lunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>I can sympathise with a lot of the comments vis racial stereotyping but Tia was the most beautiful, mesmerising female, even character, of the whole movie.  So let's not underestimate her.  Yes, I thought it was a bit stupid to have ALL the rest of the badies with dark, extra dark skin and scarey faces.  And there's a lot of fair comment about this. ( I'm a white caucasian but I noticed big time!)  It would have been good to have had a strong "dark" character on the "goodie" side.   But Tia was absolutely the best and it would have been brilliant to have had a few more like her.

AShe was one of the best bits of the movie for me.  Along with the obvious characters. I hope she's a big part of three and that there are more interesting non-scarey, non-white characters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sympathise with a lot of the comments vis racial stereotyping but Tia was the most beautiful, mesmerising female, even character, of the whole movie.  So let&#8217;s not underestimate her.  Yes, I thought it was a bit stupid to have ALL the rest of the badies with dark, extra dark skin and scarey faces.  And there&#8217;s a lot of fair comment about this. ( I&#8217;m a white caucasian but I noticed big time!)  It would have been good to have had a strong &#8220;dark&#8221; character on the &#8220;goodie&#8221; side.   But Tia was absolutely the best and it would have been brilliant to have had a few more like her.</p>
<p>AShe was one of the best bits of the movie for me.  Along with the obvious characters. I hope she&#8217;s a big part of three and that there are more interesting non-scarey, non-white characters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rony Figueroa</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rony Figueroa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>This type of stereotyping is called character assassination.  Mr. Iger, CEO of the Walt Desney Company you owe the indigenous people of the Caribbean; Kalinago, Garifuna, Taino, Arawaks and Caribs an apology.  Why don't Disney make some reparations and pays for the making of a documentary that depicts the true history of these people.  www.garifunaheritagefoundtion.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of stereotyping is called character assassination.  Mr. Iger, CEO of the Walt Desney Company you owe the indigenous people of the Caribbean; Kalinago, Garifuna, Taino, Arawaks and Caribs an apology.  Why don&#8217;t Disney make some reparations and pays for the making of a documentary that depicts the true history of these people.  <a href="http://www.garifunaheritagefoundtion.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.garifunaheritagefoundtion.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gleeson</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gleeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>This movie made me very uncomfortable as well.  The mere fact of my loving the movie increases the sensitivity of my discomfort.  I am loath to discuss it with other people since seeing the fallout you all have had over it.  I did discuss it with the family dog however and it seemed to whine listlessly into the night as I patted his head.

 The portrayal of the white men in this movie made me feel so slighted.  I speak of course of Jack Sparrow as the rum swilling pirate.  He was drunk all the way through the picture and it completely traumatized me.  How could they show that onscreen.  Not all white people are drunks.  White drunks who will betray their brother to get what they want.

Thank goodness Orlando bloom played Will Turner.  Actually, I felt that way initially, but then it all turned.  Because he went out as us stereotypical males do, and sought out Jack to free the woman he loved from jail.  This clearly showed that he thought she could not fend for herself, casting her in a subservient role.  Not all of us men are like this.  Some of us would prefer an independent woman who can take care of herself and us as well.  We call ourselves â€œFederlines.â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie made me very uncomfortable as well.  The mere fact of my loving the movie increases the sensitivity of my discomfort.  I am loath to discuss it with other people since seeing the fallout you all have had over it.  I did discuss it with the family dog however and it seemed to whine listlessly into the night as I patted his head.</p>
<p> The portrayal of the white men in this movie made me feel so slighted.  I speak of course of Jack Sparrow as the rum swilling pirate.  He was drunk all the way through the picture and it completely traumatized me.  How could they show that onscreen.  Not all white people are drunks.  White drunks who will betray their brother to get what they want.</p>
<p>Thank goodness Orlando bloom played Will Turner.  Actually, I felt that way initially, but then it all turned.  Because he went out as us stereotypical males do, and sought out Jack to free the woman he loved from jail.  This clearly showed that he thought she could not fend for herself, casting her in a subservient role.  Not all of us men are like this.  Some of us would prefer an independent woman who can take care of herself and us as well.  We call ourselves â€œFederlines.â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDF</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>LDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2006-07-09_328#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>I didn't care for Pirates II either, and that was before even considered the racial aspects mentioned in your analysis.  It seemed to me that they stripped out the humorous banter from the first movie and gave the actors parts that required no acting.  Everything was a shallow charicature based on genre stereotypes, and with little entertainment value.  If you are interested, I also wrote a review of the movie at:
http://lestdarknessfall.blogspot.com/2006/07/pirates-2-worse-than-walking-plank.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t care for Pirates II either, and that was before even considered the racial aspects mentioned in your analysis.  It seemed to me that they stripped out the humorous banter from the first movie and gave the actors parts that required no acting.  Everything was a shallow charicature based on genre stereotypes, and with little entertainment value.  If you are interested, I also wrote a review of the movie at:<br />
<a href="http://lestdarknessfall.blogspot.com/2006/07/pirates-2-worse-than-walking-plank.html" rel="nofollow">http://lestdarknessfall.blogspot.com/2006/07/pirates-2-worse-than-walking-plank.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
