<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Moments in Jurisprudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SunlessNick</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-8725</link>
		<dc:creator>SunlessNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-8725</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The judge goes on to cite (especially barbaric) â€œBiblical and Middle Assyrianâ€ law on the subject, which treated rape as â€œtrespass upon the property,â€ calling it â€œcommon law.â€&lt;/em&gt;

And it begs the question of exactly whose property the judge thinks the victim's body is.  Because I'd be a little surprised if he thought hers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The judge goes on to cite (especially barbaric) â€œBiblical and Middle Assyrianâ€ law on the subject, which treated rape as â€œtrespass upon the property,â€ calling it â€œcommon law.â€</em></p>
<p>And it begs the question of exactly whose property the judge thinks the victim&#8217;s body is.  Because I&#8217;d be a little surprised if he thought hers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lya Kahlo</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator>Lya Kahlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-7587</guid>
		<description>It means that if a woman doenst resist they way the law says she should, then she wasn't raped.  It's just another "blame the victim"  fallacy.    

This entire episode makes me literally ill. No surprise that the judges who came up with this sick rape excuse were all men.   Like I'ev said ebfore add Maryland to the list of places I'm never setting foot in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means that if a woman doenst resist they way the law says she should, then she wasn&#8217;t raped.  It&#8217;s just another &#8220;blame the victim&#8221;  fallacy.    </p>
<p>This entire episode makes me literally ill. No surprise that the judges who came up with this sick rape excuse were all men.   Like I&#8217;ev said ebfore add Maryland to the list of places I&#8217;m never setting foot in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-7547</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-11-01_436#comment-7547</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thereâ€™s no term for someone whoâ€™s forcing sex on another in a way that doesnâ€™t meet the legal requirements of a rape charge, which leads people to think itâ€™s all right.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i'm sorry but i can't untangle that sentence. what does it mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thereâ€™s no term for someone whoâ€™s forcing sex on another in a way that doesnâ€™t meet the legal requirements of a rape charge, which leads people to think itâ€™s all right.</p></blockquote>
<p>i&#8217;m sorry but i can&#8217;t untangle that sentence. what does it mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
