<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Red-blooded American Sexist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/category/series/red-blooded-american-sexist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sexist Language [Red-blooded American Sexist, Part 3]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_395</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_395#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red-blooded American Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those just tuning in, this is Part 3 of my series on a small blurb that Joseph Lisner wrote for Wizard's "How to Draw" series (found <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/rbsexist_triplethreat.jpg">here</a> [JPG]).

The language Lisner uses throughout the blurb Others, dehumanizes, and ultimately objectifies the women that he's talking about -- both drawn and real. The chart below compares the language he uses to describe women versus the language he uses to describe men. In terms of variation of terms it was equal (4 on 4), but the distribution of those terms reinforces the general message being sent in the blurb -- men as people, women as objects.

<div align="center"><table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="1">
<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#e3f197"><b>Term</b></td><td align="center" bgcolor="#e3f197"><b># of Uses</b></td><td align="center" bgcolor="#efd688"><b>Term</b></td><td align="center"  bgcolor="#efd688"><b># of Uses</b></td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>Women</b></td><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>2</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>Men</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>4</b></td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>Female</b></td><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>4</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>Male</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>1</b></td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>Girls</b></td><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>1</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>Guy</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>2</b></td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>Ladies</b></td><td bgcolor="#edf6b9"><b>1</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>Gentlemen</b></td><td bgcolor="#f1dfa9"><b>1</b></td></tr></table></div>

Lisner uses "female" the most to describe women and "men" the most to describe men. In fact, the one use of "male" is a correct usage of the term, while most of the way he uses "female" are inappropriate outside of a nature documentary or science lab. Before I get into the nitty gritty, however, let me first explain the differences between "female"/"male" and "woman"/"man". ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_395/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men Stereotyping Women [Red-blooded American Sexist, Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_394</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_394#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red-blooded American Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those just tuning in, this is Part 2 of my series on a small blurb that Joseph Lisner wrote for Wizard's "How to Draw" series (found <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/rbsexist_triplethreat.jpg">here</a> [JPG]). 

In Part 1 I discussed how Lisner relies on stereotypes of masculinity to create a "boy's club" environment meant to set his presumably male readership at ease. In Part 2 I will be focusing on the ways that he constructs femininity and in the process Others and objectifies women.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_394/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men Stereotyping Men [Red-blooded American Sexist, Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_393</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_393#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics, cartoons, manga, and anime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red-blooded American Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img alt="Disembodied Womanparts, Yay!" src=http://blog.shrub.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/rbsexist_bbl.jpg height="220" width="300" class ="imgborder"/></div><div align="center" class ="imgcaption">What kind of <strike>man</strike> misogynist are you?</div>

Right now the comics blogsphere is abuzz with criticisms of Wizard Magazine's latest disaster: their <a href="http://ratcreature.livejournal.com/175099.html">How to Draw</a> series. Well, perhaps not latest, as it seems that there have been complaints about this series for a while now. 

Following a trail of links, I came across <a href="http://ratcreature.livejournal.com/128606.html">a 2005 post</a> by LJ user Rat Creature. Which lead me to a link about the "Triple Threat" -- which, contrary to what it sounds like, is <i>not</i> a wrestling move. The triple threat, of course, references the three ways (boobs, butt, legs) in <i>red-blooded</i> American guys <strike>objectify</strike> view women! The blurb that I will be tearing apart can be found <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/rbsexist_triplethreat.jpg">here</a> (JPG). For reference, the person writing it is Joseph Lisner, known for drawing Dawn.

I've actually split this analysis into three sections, the first of which will deal with the way that Lisner constructs American masculinity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-25_393/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
