<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/category/popculture/advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Debunking the &#8220;profits come first&#8221; myth</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-07-10_724</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-07-10_724#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Behaving Badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film and televison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever criticized an ad campaign, commercial, or anything that&#8217;s even remotely related to marketing for pushing a bigoted viewpoint, you will undoubtedly have come up against the argument that of course the reason the product is being marketed that way is because it&#8217;s more profitable. A company would never do anything to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-07-10_724/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give that man a cookie, er, Klondike!</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-06-02_716</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-06-02_716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Behaving Badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Wow, a man refrains from violating the terms of his relationship agreement with his wife? Totally worthy of a reward. Give that man a cookie Klondike! &#60;insert massive eyeroll here&#62;
Actual analysis of Klondike&#8217;s latest series of commercials can be found over at The Hathor Legacy, in sbg&#8217;s post, Normal Behavior Rewarded as Extraordinary.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-06-02_716/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exposing the hypocrisy of Unilever&#8217;s targeted marketing</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-11-06_667</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-11-06_667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Behaving Badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-11-06_667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Dove and Axe &#8212; which send diametrically opposed messages about women to their target audiences &#8212; are both made by Unilever.  This video juxtaposes the two campaigns in order to raise awareness of the connection between the two.
Via The Hathor Legacy.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-11-06_667/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-08_518</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-08_518#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Behaving Badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiculturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-08_518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Feel the cultural appropriation around us
I swear I don&#8217;t go looking for these kinds of things, they find me all on their own. I went to VoodooPC&#8217;s website to check their tech support hours (in the hopes of me getting my laptop back this century&#8230;) and I saw the above image.
When you mouse over it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-08_518/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BK commercial redux: It&#8217;s not about the burgers</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-27_506</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-27_506#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-27_506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About half a year ago I wrote about the infamous Burger King commercial and I haven&#8217;t stopped getting shit about it. Even more so because it&#8217;s apparently on the air again. Most of them I just delete, but there has been one sitting in my moderation queue for more than a week now.
daisy wrote:
As a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-27_506/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oriental Barbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-17_444</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-17_444#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-17_444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Okay, so a while ago onebrownwoman has this awesome post critiquing the Diwali Barbie. This week, she posts a link to Oriental Barbie but doesn&#8217;t have time to comment on it.
Here&#8217;s what the page says about this lovely &#8220;Doll of the World&#8221;:
Oriental BarbieÂ® doll is dainty and elegant in this beautiful costume reflecting the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-17_444/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Wikipedia as a Marketing tool?</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-12_425</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-12_425#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics, cartoons, manga, and anime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-12_425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recently published How to Make Money Like a Pornstar comic has been the subject of some controversy on the blogsphere. The comic was given to Karen Healey, a well-known feminist comic&#8217;s blogger, (I Can&#8217;t BELIEVE They Sent This To Me )as well as to Kevin Church, another well known comics blogger (Review: How To [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-10-12_425/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog Highlight: Marketing to Women Online</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-12_379</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-12_379#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-12_379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I haven&#8217;t been posting. I actually have a few in mind, but it&#8217;s the end of semester crunch right now so I&#8217;ve been immersing myself in Japanese.
A small study done by University of Florida professors recently was highlighted by MSNBC because of an award it won. Although the study itself is not proof of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-09-12_379/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, An End To Single-Sex Televisions</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-06-17_312</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-06-17_312#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfpbookworm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For "her"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-06-17_312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently saw a commercial for the Sony Bravia which billed itself as "The World's First Television for Men and Women."  

At first, I thought they were advertising something like <a href="http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Double_20TV">this</a>, but after checking out the <a href="http://products.sel.sony.com/hdtv/bravia/index.html">web site</a> it turns out that it's just a marketing campaign for a high-end HDTV.

I'm trying to figure out what the advertisers were thinking this one.  I've narrowed it down to the following possibilities:
<ul>
<li>They noticed that purchasers of HDTVs were disproportionately male, and saw women as an untapped market; however, they were worried that a women-centered ad campaign would lose more male buyers.</li>
<li>They're looking to provide the stereotypical man with justifications to his stereotypical partner for the purchasing decision.</li>
</ul>
Given the blatant sexism of the advertisement, I'm leaning toward the latter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/jfpbookworm/2006-06-17_312/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am so glad I stopped eating BK</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-05-09_235</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-05-09_235#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-05-09_235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><object width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S1tpZFymL5o"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S1tpZFymL5o" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></div>

No, Burger King (BK) does not have the monopoly on awful advertising. Not by a long shot. But this new commercial combines sexism, racism, and probably a whole lot of other -isms that my mind wants to blank out into one nasty little package. I just... yeah. Didn't Carl's Jr. try this one before? And Jack in the Box? And, like, didn't it fail? Miserably?

Shame on me for trying to apply Earth Logic to Marketing! I should know better, really. But, in all seriousness, this commercial is just plain <i>bad</i>. I don't mean to pick on Burger King (well, I sort of do), but it's making the rounds on ther internet (elsewise I never would have seen it, me being in Japan and all), and I can't help but put my two cents in. Two cents that should be studying my kanji, but, hey, I got all but the hardest combinations right when my study partner quizzed me. I deserve a break.

So, without further ado, let's begin with the analysis.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-05-09_235/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
