<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Gender Caste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/category/gender-essentialism/gender-caste/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shrub.com</link>
	<description>Because we care about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why are body politics important? [Loving Our Bodies, Part 4]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-03-06_551</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-03-06_551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loving Our Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beauty Myth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-03-06_551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I had a penny for every time I&#8217;ve seen people, both men and women, call issues such as shaving &#8220;petty&#8221; or otherwise mock them when someone brings up the double standard as an example of why we aren&#8217;t equal, I would be a rich, rich woman. But why is something that, on the surface, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2008-03-06_551/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Prostitute&#8221; does not mean &#8220;worthless&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-07-30_637</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-07-30_637#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sigel Phoenix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse, rape, and domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-07-30_637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey McKee was convicted of raping two women, but received a lighter prison sentence because his victims were prostitutes.

<a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/325328_rapeappeal27.html">Luckily, there are people in the Washington state judicial system who aren't total fuckwits.</a>

Read the article for the full story, but here are a few notable quotes that illustrate the persistent sexism and victim-blaming in public attitudes towards sexual violence. Sure, society says, we'll protect the victims of rape - but only if you're the right kind of victim.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-07-30_637/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;If I were [x] I wouldn&#8217;t do that!&#8221; [Loving Our Bodies, Part 3]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-11_553</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-11_553#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loving Our Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beauty Myth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-11_553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s summer again in Japan, which means torrential downpours, blisteringly hot days, and enough humidity to make you feel like you need to shower again right after you step out of the house. It is not weather that is conducive to pants and sleeves, but rather one that lends itself better to shorts, skirts, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-11_553/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood, please stop shitting on my childhood</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-09_623</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-09_623#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film and televison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-09_623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While on vacation, I went to see the Fantastic Four movie (the only reason it was worth it was because it was the first move I had seen in theatres in over a year) and had the dubious pleasure to see a preview for the Transformers movie. Now, despite the pretty CG, I knew I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-07-09_623/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Am I the only one bothered by this?</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For "her"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was supposed to be a rant on a recent NY Times article called To Appeal to Women, Too, Gadgets Go Beyond ‘Cute’ and ‘Pink’ (feel free to bingo it in my stead), but I got to reading a Gizmodo article called NY Times: Smaller, Easier to Use Gadgets Are Made for Women and was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-06-11_611/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voice and silence [Women and Violence, Part 8]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-05-29_605</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-05-29_605#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 05:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sigel Phoenix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse, rape, and domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women and Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-05-29_605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[This is part of my series on Women and Violence, which I am writing as a project for a Women Studies course I'm taking. For an explanation and information on my intentions with this series, please see the <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-04-11_572">introduction</a>.]

In "The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action," Audre Lorde writes the following description of her thought process when faced with a potential diagnosis of cancer:

<blockquote>[...] and what I most regretted were my silences. Of what had I <i>ever</i> been afraid? To question or to speak as I believed could have meant pain, or death. But we all hurt in so many different ways, all the time, and pain will either change or end. Death, on the other hand, is the final silence. And that might be coming quickly, now, without regard for whether I had ever spoken what needed to be said, or had only betrayed myself into small silences, while I planned someday to speak, or waited for someone else's words. And I began to recognize a source of power within myself that comes from the knowledge that while it is most desirable not to be afraid, learning to put fear into a perspective gave me great strength.

I was going to die, if not sooner then later, whether or not I had ever spoken myself. My silences had not protected me. Your silence will not protect you." (41)</blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/dora/2007-05-29_605/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A deeper look into femininity [The Gaming Beauty Myth, Interlude]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-06_478</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-06_478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Cultism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beauty Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gaming Beauty Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-06_478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m labeling this as an &#8220;interlude&#8221; because the constructs of femininity I&#8217;m about to address don&#8217;t all directly intersect with the beauty myth, but the way that they interact with femininity as a whole is a topic that I feel needs to be addressed. I&#8217;ve been sitting on this one ever since Shannon over at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-02-06_478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Children and Better Women: Lessons Learned from Nanny McPhee</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2007-01-06_496</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2007-01-06_496#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lake Desire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film and televison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2007-01-06_496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On New Year&#8217;s Eve, tekanji and I watched Nanny McPhee, a British fantasy movie for children.  In the film, the magical Nanny McPhee comes to the Brown Estate to help Cedric Brown, widower and mortician, manage his seven unruly children, free of charge.  Since the death of their mother, the Brown children have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/lake-desire/2007-01-06_496/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News on genderblind college rooming</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-19_487</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-19_487#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender essentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media and journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queer Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Evil -ism's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-19_487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
On a related issue, Fox News contributes to the skyrocketing divorce rates with this insulting piece. Seriously, if their relationships are that bad that they believe that kind of BS, why are they married in the first place?
Via queer_rage
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-12-19_487/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introduction [The Gaming Beauty Myth, Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-26_438</link>
		<comments>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-26_438#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beauty Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gaming Beauty Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-26_438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The beauty myth, a term coined by Naomi Wolf in her book of the same name, essentially describes the idea that a woman is viewed first by her sexuality/attractiveness and second by everything else (more information here). When I chose to call this sereies &#8220;The Gaming Beauty Myth&#8221; it was because I wanted to take [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-11-26_438/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
