-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Spice Girls Feminism: why the third wave needs more than a band-aid | The Hathor Legacy on Can we stop misrepresenting our own movement?
- If you were hacking since age 8, it means you were privileged. « Restructure! on "Check my what?" On privilege and what we can do about it
- Timothy (TRiG) on Girly kissing, raunch culture, and me
- Maybe they deserve to get married « Random Insignificant Things on World of Warcraft: Sexist by Design?
- christopher bowers on "Check my what?" On privilege and what we can do about it
Categories
- Abuse, rape, and domestic violence
- Anti-oppression activism
- BDSM, fetishes, etc.
- Books, magazines, etc.
- Carnivals, Blog Against -ism Days, etc.
- Censorship
- Childfree Issues
- Companies Behaving Badly
- Discrimination
- Features
- Feminism
- Gender essentialism
- Gender issues
- Just plain cool
- Link Blogging
- Media and journalism
- Multiculturalism
- Personal
- Politics
- Popular Culture
- Privilege
- Queer Issues
- Religion
- Science
- Series
- Sex, sexuality, and sexual politics
- Shrub.com Related
- Technology
- Teh Funnay
- The Evil -ism's
- The Gaming Beauty Myth
- Video Games
Archives
Monthly Archives: November 2005
Support Rape: Blame a Victim Today!
Is November “National Blame The Victim Month” or something? No, I mean seriously. First it was Nick Kiddle’s post on hir near-rape experience and the discussions that followed it, then there was the McDonalds thing, and the British poll, and … Continue reading
To All Girl-loving Gamer Boys:
It’s time to end all the ignorance about women gamers and our motives. So listen up: I am a female. I am a gamer. I am not a gamer because I am boy-hunting. I am not a gamer for you. … Continue reading
Posted in Gender issues, Privilege, Video Games
12 Comments
Trading one set of chains for another
More ranting via midlife mama. Libby critiqued an article from the American Prospect Online and asked for opinions. I was foolish enough to think that I could contain my opinion in one little comment. I know, I know, I should be used to the Attack of the 50-line Comment by now. So, I decided to turn my rant/fisk into its own post.
First off, I’m going to steal Libby’s summary of the article:
It’s an article in American Prospect Online that takes all those “opt out” articles seriously. The author, Linda R. Hirshman, a feminist professor, is working on a book about “marriage after feminism.” She interviewed 30 some-odd women whose weddings were announced in the Sunday NY Times over three Sundays in 1996. Most of them, she says, were staying home with their kids 7 or 8 years later. (Actually, 50% were no longer working for pay, and a third were working part time.) : Conservatives contend that the dropouts prove that feminism “failed” because it was too radical, because women didn’t want what feminism had to offer. In fact, if half or more of feminism’s heirs (85 percent of the women in my Times sample), are not working seriously, it’s because feminism wasn’t radical enough: It changed the workplace but it didn’t change men, and, more importantly, it didn’t fundamentally change how women related to men.
[From More on the whole opt-out thing by Libby]
Just because I can, I’m going to use the same style of breakdowns as Hirshman uses in her article. Well, also I want to mock her section heads. And we all know I love mocking people and things. Also, all further quotes (unless otherwise noted) come from the article itself. Continue reading
Empowerment Through Lipstick?
Cosmetic ad from Feministe Feministe has just reinforced how much I never want ads on my blog. I had the dubious pleasure of seeing this ad on the side of the blog; one of the three from blogads that Feministe … Continue reading
Posted in Advertising, Gender Cultism
3 Comments
Think women have achieved equality? Think again.
Drawn by the Carnival of Feminists, I visited midlife mama’s article, Second Wave Feminism, Beauvoir, and me, and got into a small conversation about second-wave and third-wave feminism. In her reply, Libby discusses her experiences with the “women are equal already†sentiment that many young people (and some older ones too) hold. I, in my typical fashion, went off on a rant about how much I hate that. And, again in my typical fashion, I want to take the opportunity to elaborate on my point. Disclaimer: This post is Western-centric, with a focus on America/Canada, because that’s where most of my practical experience comes from.
So, without further ado, I present you with some food for thought on equality. Continue reading
Posted in Gender issues
90 Comments
Girly kissing, raunch culture, and me
Apparently there’s been a lot of discussion on Ariel Levy’s Female Chauvinist Pigs in the blogsphere, but I’m not really here to discuss that. What I want to talk about is Amanda’s post, Getting approval (which discusses the girls-kissing-girls part of the raunch culture), and my own experiences with it.
First things first: I am bisexual (or pansexual, more accurately). For years and years and years various things kept me closeted to myself and to those around me, but I finally came out sometime in 2003/2004. It was hard for me, especially since I was met with some scepticism from loved ones. My mother believed that people were “gay, straight, or lying†(to borrow from that hideously stupid study done a while back) and a friend said that I had to be mistaken, that I was confusing love/lust for “appreciation†of the female body. It didn’t help matters that I’ve only had one real sexual experience with a girl, especially since neither of us had any interest in pursuing anything outside of that one encounter.
So what does my personal story have to do with the pressure for straight girls to kiss each other? More than I care to admit, but admit I will. Continue reading
GQ's "Men" of the Year

One of the guys?
In my first installment of my Girls & Game Ads series, I commented on a disturbing phenomenon in the portrayal of men versus women:
Another thing evident in this particular line-up is something I’ve noticed as another feature of video game advertising: images of women tend to have the large boobs as a focus (either by showing lots of skin or by having skin-tight costumes), while images of men tend to focus on the face, or show a heavily armoured (or clothed) man. While there are obviously exceptions to this (armoured/small breasted women, scantily-clothed men, etc), I posit that this dichotomy is one that is typical in advertisements for the gaming industry.
Enter GQ and its “Man of the Year” winners. With AOL News’ tagline Aniston Joins the Guys one would expect the cover to show a confident, strong Aniston with a focus on her head/face. But GQ, unfortunately, has chosen to take the same approach to the portrayal of men and women as I described above. Continue reading
Shrub.com Article for November
November’s article, Silent Treatment is a short story and commentary on popular culture, the entertainment industry, and women’s place in all this. Wanted immediately: Hot [must be hot!] woman [must be female!] between 5’3″ and 5’10″ [must not be taller … Continue reading
Posted in Monthly Articles
Leave a comment
Chain Letter, Blogstyle!
Kristy over at kblog tagged me for some meme. For the record, kristy, I hate you. ^_^ The instructions are as follows: Go into your archive. Find your 23rd post. Find the fifth sentence (or closest to). Post the text … Continue reading
Posted in Popular Culture
7 Comments
Interesting Take on Gender and Feminism
I came across this untitled post in the feminist_rage LJ about anti-feminist misconceptions about feminism (the OP specifically addresses a white, heterosexual male that she is aquainted with for her rage). One commenter’s words just sort of jumped out at … Continue reading
Posted in Feminism, Gender Democracy
4 Comments